You Anon, need to go back and carefully watch Fall of the Cabal Part 10. All of the Comms are perfectly laid out for those minds that can see clearly.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. The Fall of the Cabal is just audio narration with stock footage, it's literally something I could make in an afternoon in my underwear. You could too. It's not evidence, just subjective anecdotes.
No. You yourself would have to do the years amount of research behind everything discussed, linked, and placed as crumbs in the background to reach that level. Clock is running….now! Let’s see if you can really do a 10 part series with that much research and Intel in 1 afternoon starting now. Put your keyboard keys where your mouth is or insert your foot! HEY ALL! He says he can make a similar Fall of the Cabal 10 part series with all the Intel Research (can’t be copied from hers) in one afternoon. So he must start today, have it done by late afternoon perfectly edited with all the bells and whistles, or he can STFU. Yep! Just called you and your BS out. Clock is running! Awaiting a 10 part video link all done by you, including full edits, music, references, by the end of 4pm Pacific today!
Again, we are talking about something to be treated as valid EVIDENCE. How do you know how much "research" he put into the videos? How do you trust that that "research" isn't just confirmation bias? How do you know that the he hasn't been misled by faulty sources? Have you gone through every point of his videos and analyzed the validity each of his claims?
My point is, just because you can opine about your subjective theories for 10 videos, doesn't mean it is true. I could make a 10-part series with "research" about how mice are attempting to take over the world. It doesn't mean anything without actual hard evidence, which his videos do not have.
And you’ve proven my point. Unable to produce any research and data attached to video you did in your underwear by this afternoon. I don’t even need to respond further.
The difference with the FotC series and others, is that she tells you to verify everything she says and not to take only her word for it. People that are trying to nudge your thinking away from the target never want to you to double check.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. The Fall of the Cabal is just audio narration with stock footage, it's literally something I could make in an afternoon in my underwear. You could too. It's not evidence, just subjective anecdotes.
No. You yourself would have to do the years amount of research behind everything discussed, linked, and placed as crumbs in the background to reach that level. Clock is running….now! Let’s see if you can really do a 10 part series with that much research and Intel in 1 afternoon starting now. Put your keyboard keys where your mouth is or insert your foot! HEY ALL! He says he can make a similar Fall of the Cabal 10 part series with all the Intel Research (can’t be copied from hers) in one afternoon. So he must start today, have it done by late afternoon perfectly edited with all the bells and whistles, or he can STFU. Yep! Just called you and your BS out. Clock is running! Awaiting a 10 part video link all done by you, including full edits, music, references, by the end of 4pm Pacific today!
Again, we are talking about something to be treated as valid EVIDENCE. How do you know how much "research" he put into the videos? How do you trust that that "research" isn't just confirmation bias? How do you know that the he hasn't been misled by faulty sources? Have you gone through every point of his videos and analyzed the validity each of his claims?
My point is, just because you can opine about your subjective theories for 10 videos, doesn't mean it is true. I could make a 10-part series with "research" about how mice are attempting to take over the world. It doesn't mean anything without actual hard evidence, which his videos do not have.
And you’ve proven my point. Unable to produce any research and data attached to video you did in your underwear by this afternoon. I don’t even need to respond further.
So if I made a video based on nothing at all, you would believe it because I said I did my research? That's all you need to hear to believe something?
For example, you trust a FoTC video simply because a random friend of yours believed it and told you to watch it. That's all it takes to convince you.
The reality is: none of that is evidence, or even research, it's just opinions from people like you and me.
The difference with the FotC series and others, is that she tells you to verify everything she says and not to take only her word for it. People that are trying to nudge your thinking away from the target never want to you to double check.