Oops - wrong result!
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
No, there is nothing they can say that should make doing, consuming or taking anything “mandatory.”
Yup. Even if this wasn't killing or maiming people, if it was a cure for cancer itself it should not be mandatory.
If it's really that good, people will eventually get it on its own after observing it and weighing the risks vs benefits. No one should ever be forced or coerced in any way.
If it was a cure for cancer, they'd charge $100,000 a shot.
They charge that for now.for therapies that may or may not work.
It wouldn’t be one-and-done. Might take three or four treatments with a booster every six months.
Hell if they had not tried so hard to make it mandatory they might have gotten more people over time even. The huge push only makes people more suspicious.