The problem with a theocracy is that there is no human being who is able to run one. Even though their intentions might start off good, the ring of power eventually twists humans toward corruption.
America may be a Constitutional Republic, but the Kingdom of God is an absolute monarchy with no representative element. You don't get to vote on whether the 10 commandments are valid or not.
Roman Republic became an absolute monarchy due to enormous corruption which could only be resolved by cataclysmic series of civil wars. History has a way of repeating.
This is a tangent but historically the most stable form of government is actually an elected monarchy. The best example would be the Republic of Venice which lasted centuries and was remarkable stable and effective given it's relative small size. Other examples would be the Holy Roman Empire which was ended by Napoleon and maybe the Byzantine Empire.
Republics with heavy representative element tend to be extremely unstable. You can look to South American Republics which all got taken over by freemasons or to the French Republic post revolution which changed governments multiple times.
Ok but by intentional design this nation has no king and can't be a theocracy
The problem with a theocracy is that there is no human being who is able to run one. Even though their intentions might start off good, the ring of power eventually twists humans toward corruption.
America may be a Constitutional Republic, but the Kingdom of God is an absolute monarchy with no representative element. You don't get to vote on whether the 10 commandments are valid or not.
Roman Republic became an absolute monarchy due to enormous corruption which could only be resolved by cataclysmic series of civil wars. History has a way of repeating.
This is a tangent but historically the most stable form of government is actually an elected monarchy. The best example would be the Republic of Venice which lasted centuries and was remarkable stable and effective given it's relative small size. Other examples would be the Holy Roman Empire which was ended by Napoleon and maybe the Byzantine Empire.
Republics with heavy representative element tend to be extremely unstable. You can look to South American Republics which all got taken over by freemasons or to the French Republic post revolution which changed governments multiple times.
Freemasons hate Catholic monarchies.
They bring down every single one in the name of "democracy".
Freemasons HATE Catholic monarchies.
So does the First Amendment. Oh well
Unless the leader is a freemason or a Jesuit..
At which point, is it even a Catholic monarchy if it is not run by a traditional Catholic but by a modernist heretic?
You'll enjoy this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQxEVHuGnQ4