Legal then vs now
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (75)
sorted by:
You shouldn't believe everything you read on Wikipedia or see in Hollywood films.
Do you even know where the "six million" number originated?
I think it's worth learning because we're often reminded to never forget:
It all started as Russian wartime propaganda claiming four million Jews were exterminated in the gas chamber showers at Auschwitz concentration camp, located in Poland.
This story was presented without evidence during the Nuremberg trials and assumed to be true, without question, by every judge.
The number was quickly increased to six million to also accommodate the gas chamber showers at Dachau concentration camp.
The Polish government later officially revised the estimate for Auschwitz down from four million to 1.1 million after their investigation determined it would be scientifically impossible to execute more than 1.1 million Jews using Auschwitz's gas chambers and ovens.
Dozens of teams of scientists later forensically tested the walls, structure and soil from both the Auschwitz and Dachau gas chamber showers and found no residual traces of the deadly Zyklon B gas. Many tests were performed by different teams because nobody could believe the results, despite every team producing the same results proving NOBODY was gassed in the showers at either camp.
Dachau Concentration Camp Memorial Site staff posted signs in several languages to inform tourists that their "death camp gas chamber showers" were just normal showers.
And that's where the six million number originated.
1.1 million, 6 million, 500,000... what do these numbers have in common? They're all too high.
The conspiracy is not whether or not the holocaust happened. It did. The conspiracy is how that event is used to diminish the atrocities of Stalin and Mao which have something like 100 million plus CONFIRMED murders whereas estimates almost reach the 1 B mark... the conspiracy is that Hitler was somehow super evil and the Nazis were all literally Satan incarnate when in reality most Germans and Nazi soldiers didn't even know about the camps and Hitler was likely just the face of the party. The conspiracy is that Nazism, which is literally no different from China Communism, gets scorned into oblivion, but Communism gets a free fuckin pass. The desire to have dominion over other humans is the root of evil. Nazism and Communism are both evil. The end.
Did you know that WW2 was declared hours after Hitler kicked the Rothschild central bankers out of Germany and Austria?
Are you aware that one million Jewish prisoners and ten million German civilians starved to death AFTER WW2 ended, between 1945 and 1947 mostly because of allied sanctions?
This isn't a controversial topic because Eisenhower's Holocaust isn't disputed by any historian.
Yet everyone has seen the photos of German prison guards burying starved prisoners in mass graves. These photos are often the centerpiece of Holocaust Museums and History Channel documentaries and most people never think to ask if those photos were taken before or AFTER the war ended. Most people never think to question why prison guards went to the effort of digging huge burial pits when they allegedly had massive crematorium infrastructure onsite.
Declared by who an to whom? The US didn't declare war until after Pearl Harbor.
The argument is not whether or not it happened. And it was still bad regardless.
The one thing you types can never explain is all of the survivors who have provided consistent witness testimony over the years. The only explanation deniers can produce is "it was all coordinated". Okay... by now that inconsistency would have been vetted or discovered. Witness testimony has yet to be disproven or verified false. So until that can happen or be proven, your little theories are just that and nothing more.
What testimony? For example there is a fella who claims he saw mass graves at treblinka the size of 3 football fields. Satellite photos show no such disturbance, ground penetrating radar shows nothing archeological digs in the area are blocked by Israeli government. His testimony could be proven or disproven but it's not allowed. If you possessed an ounce of critical thinking skills you would have to ask yourself why? If something really did take place would it not only go to prove the story, if you are allowed to find evidence?