Legal then vs now
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (75)
sorted by:
Did you know that WW2 was declared hours after Hitler kicked the Rothschild central bankers out of Germany and Austria?
Are you aware that one million Jewish prisoners and ten million German civilians starved to death AFTER WW2 ended, between 1945 and 1947 mostly because of allied sanctions?
This isn't a controversial topic because Eisenhower's Holocaust isn't disputed by any historian.
Yet everyone has seen the photos of German prison guards burying starved prisoners in mass graves. These photos are often the centerpiece of Holocaust Museums and History Channel documentaries and most people never think to ask if those photos were taken before or AFTER the war ended. Most people never think to question why prison guards went to the effort of digging huge burial pits when they allegedly had massive crematorium infrastructure onsite.
Based MontyMole.
Declared by who an to whom? The US didn't declare war until after Pearl Harbor.
The argument is not whether or not it happened. And it was still bad regardless.
The one thing you types can never explain is all of the survivors who have provided consistent witness testimony over the years. The only explanation deniers can produce is "it was all coordinated". Okay... by now that inconsistency would have been vetted or discovered. Witness testimony has yet to be disproven or verified false. So until that can happen or be proven, your little theories are just that and nothing more.
What testimony? For example there is a fella who claims he saw mass graves at treblinka the size of 3 football fields. Satellite photos show no such disturbance, ground penetrating radar shows nothing archeological digs in the area are blocked by Israeli government. His testimony could be proven or disproven but it's not allowed. If you possessed an ounce of critical thinking skills you would have to ask yourself why? If something really did take place would it not only go to prove the story, if you are allowed to find evidence?