Like many here, I am intrigued by and hopeful about Devolution. It is complex, and it is not as easy to piece together as I would like, although if it were then the bad guys would understand too much. I, for sure, do not pretend to understand it's depths and complexities, and only track it at a high level.
The essence of my post is this: is there consensus regarding the outcomes of Devolution? It seems like most discussion is hindsight... "See, this proves that we've been witnessing Devolution." But how well are we able to understand where we are headed, especially related to the NWO and a Reset that is ushered in by the cabal?
It becomes a lot easier if, instead of trying to fix a broken clock, your plan is to smash it, clean up and make a new one. That's how I see the plan: not a series of delicate interventions but rather waves of throwing dirt and rocks in the gears--- eventually it breaks. Simple, effective, unpredictable.
I can concur with that assessment too. Bring it all down inone huge destructive fire and build from the ashes, like the Phoenix bird.
Good anology, but with the added caveat that for people looking at the clock, unless they see it carefully, they cannot know that it is being shattered and rebuilt.
Hmm. Maybe. But I have a feeling the happening will be obvious to everyone, when it happens. Right now it's just all the works getting gummed up and groaning behind the scenes, but eventually the face falls off and it all explodes. But that's my theory. Could be wrong.