If you think someone is doing something illegal (an actual pedophile), report them to the authorities. If you want to present evidence of such illegal activity you can even report it here. But having a different opinion on something that may or may not be as you have characterized it is not a reason for libel.
If free speech is not allowed, then what's the fucking point? It is essential that all people be able to voice their opinion. I know that I also would be much more pleased if they got to the more serious crimes we all know have occurred. Having sex with underage teenagers is NOT the same level of crime as doing that with children, or harvesting their blood, or selling them into slavery, or using them for ritual sacrifice, etc.
If someone that has a different view than you is offending you, ignore them. It's not hard. If you choose to engage someone with a differing opinion then use evidence and not emotion to do so.
Posts like this are completely inappropriate and have nothing to do with debate, nor any efforts to finding the Truth, nor anything having to do with the Great Awakening. I see only libel here.
The moment we stop allowing dissenting views we become no less of an echo chamber than Facebook; the exact evils we wish to quell.
Libel my ass. HE stands by his sick public comments and defends them. This isn’t about a “different view”; he’s inappropriate. What would happen in a workplace if a man asked a woman for nudes? And he’s calling minor sex trafficking victims PROSTITUTES, SLUTS, ATTENTION WHORES. But hey, if you support that shit...
I certainly wouldn't ban such a person, nevertheless, that is not the same thing.
From what I've seen (which is only what you've shown me) it seems that this person has legitimate points (that I wholeheartedly agree with), even if they are saying other things I don't approve of nor appreciate. Maybe I'm wrong and this person is a clown. As I said, I haven't seen much, just what you presented. But it doesn't appear to me from what you have said, that they are in fact a C_A or other plant. Just someone with a different opinion.
An anti-Q person on the other hand is in general completely different. If someone that is anti-Q comes here and they just are anti-Q and wish to engage in debate, then kicking them off would be the worst possible mod behavior and I have spoken out against that vehemently in the past when I have seen what appears to be that sort of behavior.
Usually however, such a person comes here not to exercise free speech or engage in debate but to purposefully attack and cause problems. In other words, their entire purpose for being here is to create chaos, not add their voice (that I agree with or don') to the conversation.
It appears to me this person you are libeling is just engaging in debate, and saying things you disagree with.
If you think someone is doing something illegal (an actual pedophile), report them to the authorities. If you want to present evidence of such illegal activity you can even report it here. But having a different opinion on something that may or may not be as you have characterized it is not a reason for libel.
If free speech is not allowed, then what's the fucking point? It is essential that all people be able to voice their opinion. I know that I also would be much more pleased if they got to the more serious crimes we all know have occurred. Having sex with underage teenagers is NOT the same level of crime as doing that with children, or harvesting their blood, or selling them into slavery, or using them for ritual sacrifice, etc.
If someone that has a different view than you is offending you, ignore them. It's not hard. If you choose to engage someone with a differing opinion then use evidence and not emotion to do so.
Posts like this are completely inappropriate and have nothing to do with debate, nor any efforts to finding the Truth, nor anything having to do with the Great Awakening. I see only libel here.
The moment we stop allowing dissenting views we become no less of an echo chamber than Facebook; the exact evils we wish to quell.
Libel my ass. HE stands by his sick public comments and defends them. This isn’t about a “different view”; he’s inappropriate. What would happen in a workplace if a man asked a woman for nudes? And he’s calling minor sex trafficking victims PROSTITUTES, SLUTS, ATTENTION WHORES. But hey, if you support that shit...
I don't have to support what someone says to defend their right to say it.
And if an anti-Trumper comes on here talking shit about Q he’s banned INSTANTLY. But meh FREE SPEECH!
I certainly wouldn't ban such a person, nevertheless, that is not the same thing.
From what I've seen (which is only what you've shown me) it seems that this person has legitimate points (that I wholeheartedly agree with), even if they are saying other things I don't approve of nor appreciate. Maybe I'm wrong and this person is a clown. As I said, I haven't seen much, just what you presented. But it doesn't appear to me from what you have said, that they are in fact a C_A or other plant. Just someone with a different opinion.
An anti-Q person on the other hand is in general completely different. If someone that is anti-Q comes here and they just are anti-Q and wish to engage in debate, then kicking them off would be the worst possible mod behavior and I have spoken out against that vehemently in the past when I have seen what appears to be that sort of behavior.
Usually however, such a person comes here not to exercise free speech or engage in debate but to purposefully attack and cause problems. In other words, their entire purpose for being here is to create chaos, not add their voice (that I agree with or don') to the conversation.
It appears to me this person you are libeling is just engaging in debate, and saying things you disagree with.