I certainly wouldn't ban such a person, nevertheless, that is not the same thing.
From what I've seen (which is only what you've shown me) it seems that this person has legitimate points (that I wholeheartedly agree with), even if they are saying other things I don't approve of nor appreciate. Maybe I'm wrong and this person is a clown. As I said, I haven't seen much, just what you presented. But it doesn't appear to me from what you have said, that they are in fact a C_A or other plant. Just someone with a different opinion.
An anti-Q person on the other hand is in general completely different. If someone that is anti-Q comes here and they just are anti-Q and wish to engage in debate, then kicking them off would be the worst possible mod behavior and I have spoken out against that vehemently in the past when I have seen what appears to be that sort of behavior.
Usually however, such a person comes here not to exercise free speech or engage in debate but to purposefully attack and cause problems. In other words, their entire purpose for being here is to create chaos, not add their voice (that I agree with or don') to the conversation.
It appears to me this person you are libeling is just engaging in debate, and saying things you disagree with.
The fucker should have been banned for his filthy post that WAS removed. Is this site ok with sexual harassment? Shaming 14 yr old rape victims with being called WHORES and SLUTS? You’re dealing with some BAD OPTICS here letting this shit slide and now the pedo fucker is emboldened because “meh free speech”. I don’t give a fuck if anyone thinks he’s CIA; I think he’s a fucking pedophile who needs what’s coming to him. And don’t give me shit that “we ban people when they pick on q bc they’re just here to cause trouble”. What the fuck is this asshole doing, baking cookies for the fucking Sunday school fundraiser?
Did this person actually harass someone with physical sexual attacks or even sexual innuendo?
Accusing someone of "sexual harassment" for saying that a 14 yr old (as you assert, though I did not see it myself) was a whore and a slut is libel on your part. It is not sexual harassment on their part. I have known quite a few people that have been the victims of sexual harassment. That is not it. It looks nothing like that. All that is, is saying something you disagree with. Don't get me wrong. I find it offensive too, but just because I don't agree with the assertion (if they did in fact say that) doesn't mean I think it is criminal activity. I see no victim there. If there is no victim, there is no crime. The idea that victimless crimes exist (victimless sexual harassment no less) is exactly the fraud with our system of laws and the reason we are here in the situation we are in.
On the other hand, I have known some 14 year olds that would fall into both of the categories of "slut" and "whore". Its ugly (at least in the "whore" part), and life is not clean and tidy. But not all young women who engage in sex are victims. I am not in any way saying that that applies here, but to say that your ideals are reality and that anyone who disagrees with your version of reality is sexually harassing someone has nothing to do with actual Reality. It is also not going to help advance the GA, nor help anyone find the Truth of anything. It is only a personal attack on someone you find offensive.
Where the fuck did I say calling a 14 year old rape victim a WHORE is sexual harassment? Knock it off with your “libel”! As posted, he asked a woman here in a joking-not-joking way for nude photos. That IS sexual-harassment. I am old school military, I know what it is. And he DEFENDS IT by saying she has a man-pleasing problem FOR QUOTING SCRIPTURE. And NOWHERE does he deny everyone’s accusations, he just keeps going with it. So is allowing this sick emboldened fuck to dig in on his perversion advancing the GA? Do you think people aren’t watching? And now I’m the one with the problem for my “personal attacks”?
I think he's calling my chain w that lady poster harassment in his defense
I mean i was trying to be weird and waiting for someone to say something. It was supposed to be a whole thing but it never caught on.
And if an anti-Trumper comes on here talking shit about Q he’s banned INSTANTLY. But meh FREE SPEECH!
I certainly wouldn't ban such a person, nevertheless, that is not the same thing.
From what I've seen (which is only what you've shown me) it seems that this person has legitimate points (that I wholeheartedly agree with), even if they are saying other things I don't approve of nor appreciate. Maybe I'm wrong and this person is a clown. As I said, I haven't seen much, just what you presented. But it doesn't appear to me from what you have said, that they are in fact a C_A or other plant. Just someone with a different opinion.
An anti-Q person on the other hand is in general completely different. If someone that is anti-Q comes here and they just are anti-Q and wish to engage in debate, then kicking them off would be the worst possible mod behavior and I have spoken out against that vehemently in the past when I have seen what appears to be that sort of behavior.
Usually however, such a person comes here not to exercise free speech or engage in debate but to purposefully attack and cause problems. In other words, their entire purpose for being here is to create chaos, not add their voice (that I agree with or don') to the conversation.
It appears to me this person you are libeling is just engaging in debate, and saying things you disagree with.
The fucker should have been banned for his filthy post that WAS removed. Is this site ok with sexual harassment? Shaming 14 yr old rape victims with being called WHORES and SLUTS? You’re dealing with some BAD OPTICS here letting this shit slide and now the pedo fucker is emboldened because “meh free speech”. I don’t give a fuck if anyone thinks he’s CIA; I think he’s a fucking pedophile who needs what’s coming to him. And don’t give me shit that “we ban people when they pick on q bc they’re just here to cause trouble”. What the fuck is this asshole doing, baking cookies for the fucking Sunday school fundraiser?
Do you know what sexual harassment is?
Did this person actually harass someone with physical sexual attacks or even sexual innuendo?
Accusing someone of "sexual harassment" for saying that a 14 yr old (as you assert, though I did not see it myself) was a whore and a slut is libel on your part. It is not sexual harassment on their part. I have known quite a few people that have been the victims of sexual harassment. That is not it. It looks nothing like that. All that is, is saying something you disagree with. Don't get me wrong. I find it offensive too, but just because I don't agree with the assertion (if they did in fact say that) doesn't mean I think it is criminal activity. I see no victim there. If there is no victim, there is no crime. The idea that victimless crimes exist (victimless sexual harassment no less) is exactly the fraud with our system of laws and the reason we are here in the situation we are in.
On the other hand, I have known some 14 year olds that would fall into both of the categories of "slut" and "whore". Its ugly (at least in the "whore" part), and life is not clean and tidy. But not all young women who engage in sex are victims. I am not in any way saying that that applies here, but to say that your ideals are reality and that anyone who disagrees with your version of reality is sexually harassing someone has nothing to do with actual Reality. It is also not going to help advance the GA, nor help anyone find the Truth of anything. It is only a personal attack on someone you find offensive.
Where the fuck did I say calling a 14 year old rape victim a WHORE is sexual harassment? Knock it off with your “libel”! As posted, he asked a woman here in a joking-not-joking way for nude photos. That IS sexual-harassment. I am old school military, I know what it is. And he DEFENDS IT by saying she has a man-pleasing problem FOR QUOTING SCRIPTURE. And NOWHERE does he deny everyone’s accusations, he just keeps going with it. So is allowing this sick emboldened fuck to dig in on his perversion advancing the GA? Do you think people aren’t watching? And now I’m the one with the problem for my “personal attacks”?
I think he's calling my chain w that lady poster harassment in his defense I mean i was trying to be weird and waiting for someone to say something. It was supposed to be a whole thing but it never caught on.