The fucker should have been banned for his filthy post that WAS removed. Is this site ok with sexual harassment? Shaming 14 yr old rape victims with being called WHORES and SLUTS? You’re dealing with some BAD OPTICS here letting this shit slide and now the pedo fucker is emboldened because “meh free speech”. I don’t give a fuck if anyone thinks he’s CIA; I think he’s a fucking pedophile who needs what’s coming to him. And don’t give me shit that “we ban people when they pick on q bc they’re just here to cause trouble”. What the fuck is this asshole doing, baking cookies for the fucking Sunday school fundraiser?
Did this person actually harass someone with physical sexual attacks or even sexual innuendo?
Accusing someone of "sexual harassment" for saying that a 14 yr old (as you assert, though I did not see it myself) was a whore and a slut is libel on your part. It is not sexual harassment on their part. I have known quite a few people that have been the victims of sexual harassment. That is not it. It looks nothing like that. All that is, is saying something you disagree with. Don't get me wrong. I find it offensive too, but just because I don't agree with the assertion (if they did in fact say that) doesn't mean I think it is criminal activity. I see no victim there. If there is no victim, there is no crime. The idea that victimless crimes exist (victimless sexual harassment no less) is exactly the fraud with our system of laws and the reason we are here in the situation we are in.
On the other hand, I have known some 14 year olds that would fall into both of the categories of "slut" and "whore". Its ugly (at least in the "whore" part), and life is not clean and tidy. But not all young women who engage in sex are victims. I am not in any way saying that that applies here, but to say that your ideals are reality and that anyone who disagrees with your version of reality is sexually harassing someone has nothing to do with actual Reality. It is also not going to help advance the GA, nor help anyone find the Truth of anything. It is only a personal attack on someone you find offensive.
Where the fuck did I say calling a 14 year old rape victim a WHORE is sexual harassment? Knock it off with your “libel”! As posted, he asked a woman here in a joking-not-joking way for nude photos. That IS sexual-harassment. I am old school military, I know what it is. And he DEFENDS IT by saying she has a man-pleasing problem FOR QUOTING SCRIPTURE. And NOWHERE does he deny everyone’s accusations, he just keeps going with it. So is allowing this sick emboldened fuck to dig in on his perversion advancing the GA? Do you think people aren’t watching? And now I’m the one with the problem for my “personal attacks”?
As posted, he asked a woman here in a joking-not-joking way for nude photos.
If you had included this with the context of sexual harassment instead of the 14 year old as context, I wouldn't have misunderstood the context.
Context is important. Nevertheless, I'm not sure that's sexual harassment per se, though it is extremely rude and likely bannable. Which means there is an appropriate channel to take care of the problem.
And now I’m the one with the problem for my “personal attacks”?
You are making personal attacks. There can be no doubts about that. You are attacking that person with accusations of crimes (pedophilia) for which there is no evidence. What you are doing is wrong. These problems sort themselves out much better when you don't do things the way you are doing them. What you are doing IS libel:
Libel: the legally indefensible publication or broadcast of words or images that are degrading to a person or injurious to his or her reputation.
You have called someone a pedophile, despite no actual pedophile behavior or actions that you know of. That is exactly the definition of libel. Whether you like it or not, that's what it is. No matter how justified you feel your behavior is, I find it disgusting. There are many other ways of handling whatever problems you may have than being degrading and falsely accusing (or accusing without evidence) someone of a crime that there is no evidence they have committed.
Stop attacking people. Do what you feel is right through the proper channels. Calling people out for having a different opinion is not the right path. It helps no one, and only harms people and the greater debate.
They were TWO SEPARATE sentences, divided by question marks! Keep up! And I DID REPORT his comments! Why the fuck do you think I went to this public route to expose this pedophile? And yes, he is a pedophile! I will not apologize for using that term, I don’t care what label you put on it. Because I guarandamntee you if someone called ME a pedophile, I’d be crawling through the screen ripping their faces off their skulls, and yet he doubles down. I’m done with this. It’s almost like you’re making excuses for his behavior and that says a hell of a lot about YOU. Meh FREE SPEECH my ass.
I think he's calling my chain w that lady poster harassment in his defense
I mean i was trying to be weird and waiting for someone to say something. It was supposed to be a whole thing but it never caught on.
The fucker should have been banned for his filthy post that WAS removed. Is this site ok with sexual harassment? Shaming 14 yr old rape victims with being called WHORES and SLUTS? You’re dealing with some BAD OPTICS here letting this shit slide and now the pedo fucker is emboldened because “meh free speech”. I don’t give a fuck if anyone thinks he’s CIA; I think he’s a fucking pedophile who needs what’s coming to him. And don’t give me shit that “we ban people when they pick on q bc they’re just here to cause trouble”. What the fuck is this asshole doing, baking cookies for the fucking Sunday school fundraiser?
Do you know what sexual harassment is?
Did this person actually harass someone with physical sexual attacks or even sexual innuendo?
Accusing someone of "sexual harassment" for saying that a 14 yr old (as you assert, though I did not see it myself) was a whore and a slut is libel on your part. It is not sexual harassment on their part. I have known quite a few people that have been the victims of sexual harassment. That is not it. It looks nothing like that. All that is, is saying something you disagree with. Don't get me wrong. I find it offensive too, but just because I don't agree with the assertion (if they did in fact say that) doesn't mean I think it is criminal activity. I see no victim there. If there is no victim, there is no crime. The idea that victimless crimes exist (victimless sexual harassment no less) is exactly the fraud with our system of laws and the reason we are here in the situation we are in.
On the other hand, I have known some 14 year olds that would fall into both of the categories of "slut" and "whore". Its ugly (at least in the "whore" part), and life is not clean and tidy. But not all young women who engage in sex are victims. I am not in any way saying that that applies here, but to say that your ideals are reality and that anyone who disagrees with your version of reality is sexually harassing someone has nothing to do with actual Reality. It is also not going to help advance the GA, nor help anyone find the Truth of anything. It is only a personal attack on someone you find offensive.
Where the fuck did I say calling a 14 year old rape victim a WHORE is sexual harassment? Knock it off with your “libel”! As posted, he asked a woman here in a joking-not-joking way for nude photos. That IS sexual-harassment. I am old school military, I know what it is. And he DEFENDS IT by saying she has a man-pleasing problem FOR QUOTING SCRIPTURE. And NOWHERE does he deny everyone’s accusations, he just keeps going with it. So is allowing this sick emboldened fuck to dig in on his perversion advancing the GA? Do you think people aren’t watching? And now I’m the one with the problem for my “personal attacks”?
If you had included this with the context of sexual harassment instead of the 14 year old as context, I wouldn't have misunderstood the context.
Context is important. Nevertheless, I'm not sure that's sexual harassment per se, though it is extremely rude and likely bannable. Which means there is an appropriate channel to take care of the problem.
You are making personal attacks. There can be no doubts about that. You are attacking that person with accusations of crimes (pedophilia) for which there is no evidence. What you are doing is wrong. These problems sort themselves out much better when you don't do things the way you are doing them. What you are doing IS libel:
You have called someone a pedophile, despite no actual pedophile behavior or actions that you know of. That is exactly the definition of libel. Whether you like it or not, that's what it is. No matter how justified you feel your behavior is, I find it disgusting. There are many other ways of handling whatever problems you may have than being degrading and falsely accusing (or accusing without evidence) someone of a crime that there is no evidence they have committed.
Stop attacking people. Do what you feel is right through the proper channels. Calling people out for having a different opinion is not the right path. It helps no one, and only harms people and the greater debate.
They were TWO SEPARATE sentences, divided by question marks! Keep up! And I DID REPORT his comments! Why the fuck do you think I went to this public route to expose this pedophile? And yes, he is a pedophile! I will not apologize for using that term, I don’t care what label you put on it. Because I guarandamntee you if someone called ME a pedophile, I’d be crawling through the screen ripping their faces off their skulls, and yet he doubles down. I’m done with this. It’s almost like you’re making excuses for his behavior and that says a hell of a lot about YOU. Meh FREE SPEECH my ass.
I think he's calling my chain w that lady poster harassment in his defense I mean i was trying to be weird and waiting for someone to say something. It was supposed to be a whole thing but it never caught on.