Except the voting sure. No one "should" vote bc there is no need of a State. In a moral or principle sense. In a strategic sense as part of the class war against the globalists everyone who can vote should vote against global corporatism
Anyone with sexually mature organs, including seventh graders and younger, qualifies as being competent enough to drive a one and a half ton vehicle through Middleton to Philadelphia traffic? BTW, anarchy means the absence of a state, not the absence of the individual vote.
I am an anarchist in the Mises sense.
Am I to interpret that as a 'yes'?
Except the voting sure. No one "should" vote bc there is no need of a State. In a moral or principle sense. In a strategic sense as part of the class war against the globalists everyone who can vote should vote against global corporatism
Anyone with sexually mature organs, including seventh graders and younger, qualifies as being competent enough to drive a one and a half ton vehicle through Middleton to Philadelphia traffic? BTW, anarchy means the absence of a state, not the absence of the individual vote.
I know for a fact that in Iran 12 year olds do that kinda stuff. 10 even.
Obviously we are talking about voting for govt officials. Did you mean "family vote for which restaurant?"