Word NOW on the street with leftists is Ron Watkins is Q - they WERE saying it was Austin Steinbart. What changes?
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
They cannot find Q. Anywhere.
No arrest.
No charges.
No subpoena.
No back-trace.
No intelligence of who "Q" actually is.
No (successful) attempt to locate and "bring to justice" someone the Federal Government considers a cult leader.
Why not?
How Government handles an actual threat: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/un-sounds-alarm-over-extrajudicial-killings-in-the-talibans-afghanistan/ar-AAROisN?ocid=uxbndlbing
How Government handles a perceived threat: https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/10/politics/list-january-6-subpoenas/index.html
How Government handles an online troll: https://www.justice.gov/usao-az/pr/defendant-sentenced-online-threats
How Government handles Q: ... "Evil QAnon!!!"
Not just some autistic dweeb on 4chan, is it?
Ron Watkins as q 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
This, that guy is not very smart
To his credit, he knows how to milk an audience.
That's what the leftist Reddit moderator that posts on this site thinks.
That’s not actually true. I don’t know who Q is, nor do I really care. All I want to know is if he has the ability to credibly make the claims he does. That would likely require someone of the appropriate clearance in the military or intelligence community.
Who Q is matters less to me than the credibility of the person(s) behind the account. I can’t really establish that without knowing Q’s background or currentish capabilities in gathering intelligence.
And what you said just 4 days ago:
Considering you believe there is "evidence" that Ron Watkins is Q, and every piece of evidence being circulated by leftists out there is likewise accusing Ron Watkins of being Q, my statement is actually true, you dumbfuck.
Now proceed elsewhere, troll. Or we can bring up your constant shit-talking about the people here on your little www.libreddit.com and how you're so proud of infiltrating us ;)
What I said is that evidence apparently exists. I don’t know the veracity of it because I don’t really care. I know he apparently wiggled his eyebrows on an HBO documentary or something, but I did not watch it, because… why would I? I don’t need a documentary to tell me about Q stuff.
This was in a discussion about why the government wouldn’t take action against a LARP. Watkins was a useful example of that. I wasn’t suggesting it was something I believed.
And I’m not infiltrating. Infiltrators hide. I have not. I have always been respectful here. Being a Q researcher isn’t the same thing as being a Q believer. Just like you can still research a vaccine that you believe is fake.
Research needs multiple perspectives. Otherwise, it’s theology.
Worth noting that some of us here do not blindly trust and instead see for better or for worse, there is a direct link between Trump and Q that lends legitimacy that has been reinforced repeatedly via "proofs", even if it's just for viral ARG style marketing.
I sincerely hope that it is legitimate as things are heading to a bad place and all of us I'm sure would like to avoid Civil War. It is also clear via Epstein & Maxwell that many elites and platforms like Reddit are compromised and favorable to pedophilia. Combined with many that seem to have occult and/or luciferian ties.
My trust is in Jesus Christ alone.