Word NOW on the street with leftists is Ron Watkins is Q - they WERE saying it was Austin Steinbart. What changes?
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
They cannot find Q. Anywhere.
No arrest.
No charges.
No subpoena.
No back-trace.
No intelligence of who "Q" actually is.
No (successful) attempt to locate and "bring to justice" someone the Federal Government considers a cult leader.
Why not?
How Government handles an actual threat: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/un-sounds-alarm-over-extrajudicial-killings-in-the-talibans-afghanistan/ar-AAROisN?ocid=uxbndlbing
How Government handles a perceived threat: https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/10/politics/list-january-6-subpoenas/index.html
How Government handles an online troll: https://www.justice.gov/usao-az/pr/defendant-sentenced-online-threats
How Government handles Q: ... "Evil QAnon!!!"
Not just some autistic dweeb on 4chan, is it?
That’s not actually true. I don’t know who Q is, nor do I really care. All I want to know is if he has the ability to credibly make the claims he does. That would likely require someone of the appropriate clearance in the military or intelligence community.
Who Q is matters less to me than the credibility of the person(s) behind the account. I can’t really establish that without knowing Q’s background or currentish capabilities in gathering intelligence.
And what you said just 4 days ago:
Considering you believe there is "evidence" that Ron Watkins is Q, and every piece of evidence being circulated by leftists out there is likewise accusing Ron Watkins of being Q, my statement is actually true, you dumbfuck.
Now proceed elsewhere, troll. Or we can bring up your constant shit-talking about the people here on your little www.libreddit.com and how you're so proud of infiltrating us ;)
What I said is that evidence apparently exists. I don’t know the veracity of it because I don’t really care. I know he apparently wiggled his eyebrows on an HBO documentary or something, but I did not watch it, because… why would I? I don’t need a documentary to tell me about Q stuff.
This was in a discussion about why the government wouldn’t take action against a LARP. Watkins was a useful example of that. I wasn’t suggesting it was something I believed.
And I’m not infiltrating. Infiltrators hide. I have not. I have always been respectful here. Being a Q researcher isn’t the same thing as being a Q believer. Just like you can still research a vaccine that you believe is fake.
Research needs multiple perspectives. Otherwise, it’s theology.
Then you can count yourself as the exception to corporations that currently make a profit off of 'telling people about Q stuff' with their slant.
You hide most of your hostility to us. Thus, you walked through an open door, hiding your hostility, in a place where you ordinarily wouldn't be welcome, except for the fact that people (moderators) thought you cared about their perspective as anything other than a delusional curiosity to be studied (and then scoffed at on outside channels). Hence, infiltration. You know it's true, buddy.
Keyword being "here," and "always" is still incorrect- u/Zeitreise called you out pretty well, didn't he?
Do you think we have a problem with 'perspective,' when some of us are Jewish, while others would probably gas everyone who is Jewish if they had a chance? Anti-semitism is anti-Q btw, Nazis are the bad guy in Q Lore (in case you missed it). You must be ignoring the diversity of this movement if you think we're cookie-cutters that see #17 in everything and think that it's important.
What has your infiltration been for, anyway? It has been 238 days so far that you've had an account here, what could you possibly be learning about the people in this movement that you shouldn't already know? The one thing you could've learned - the driving force behind people that follow "Q" - is still lost on you. You still lump all of us in with the idiots saying they see "#17" everywhere, so what's the point of your perspective if that's your opinion of us? It's like the contribution of a sweat bee to a group of dogs - a minor annoyance that keeps landing on your paw.
We'll just wait and see what happens as far as "the storm" goes, but you're not really achieving anything here for yourself or others.
I think “the driving force of Q” is actually fairly complex, and different for different people. GAW is the largest public community of Q people, but certainly not the only one. Independent Facebook networks, work buddies, and church groups all have different ideas of what the Q movement is.
Which, I think, explains the JFK Jr people out in Dallas and other odd beliefs attached to “QAnon.” Without access to GAW, the Q-inspired belief that you can’t trust the media or authority or anything else opens up a lot of possible truths, and some communities apparently found truth that GAW mostly rejects.
I fully recognize that you can’t generalize a set of beliefs to any particular believer in Q. I can only observe popular beliefs. There is always a post here remaking when 17 is in the news. You may find it silly, but not everyone does.
So why do you accept their presence here despite their different perspective? Because they’re fellow researchers looking for the truth about Q. You can forgive some faulty beliefs.
On that basis, I’m not certain that my mere disinclination to believe in Q the way you do makes my research any less viable than anyone else’s.
Worth noting that some of us here do not blindly trust and instead see for better or for worse, there is a direct link between Trump and Q that lends legitimacy that has been reinforced repeatedly via "proofs", even if it's just for viral ARG style marketing.
I sincerely hope that it is legitimate as things are heading to a bad place and all of us I'm sure would like to avoid Civil War. It is also clear via Epstein & Maxwell that many elites and platforms like Reddit are compromised and favorable to pedophilia. Combined with many that seem to have occult and/or luciferian ties.
My trust is in Jesus Christ alone.