US Government & Jan 6 Committee has shown they can arrest and/or subpoena anyone for anything - why can't they get "Q?"
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
The Sergeant at Arms is a State House actor for Congressional grounds. You didn't read the entire link you provided. It also says-- "However, law experts tell the Verify team that this is highly unlikely". In other words the Sergeant At Arms to arrest and detain anyone is dubious and very questionable.
That you took the bait laid out in front of you. The article points out that legally, I am correct. In very few, very simple words. This specific article was chosen because I wanted to know "your purpose here."
Try to do better than grasping for whatever you can in a vain attempt to be right. It's sickening, and our movement deserves far better representation than what we have now. Admit when you make a mistake and own up to it - you are not special. It's such a shame to me when my children act more mature than grown, married fucking adults. Get your shit together bro.
Alright then. Provide me one example in which the Sergeant at Arms arrested someone. Come on I'm waiting...............
Moving the goalposts again, retard?
You can read the story of Mally Daugherty.
Or you can watch the Texas Sergeant at Arms presenting warrants preparing for arrests.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/08/12/watch-texas-house-democrats-served-arrest-warrants/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/05/15/house-has-power-arrest-people-who-defy-its-orders/
Again - you're wrong, and moving goalposts isn't going to change that, you stupid son of a bitch.
Now your name calling? But still can't provide one case of the Sergeant at Arms being used to arrest former Administration officials. I'm still waiting.