No, it wasn't. I trimmed the conversation down. This is the summarized version not the lengthy one they wrote. I just wrote an abbreviated version of what was a long conversation between two leftists. What's funny is how clueless the two leftists were to what they were actually saying. Since both wrote two page responses they couldn't actually understand their own words.
They love word salads, but they hate listening. And Lefty #1 didn't even pick up that his own argument had been debunked. Lefty #2 didn't even realize that he had actually prove Q's point about the sealed indictments. You see that tho with a lot of the shills and leftists. Lots of talking. Very little listening.
I think a lot of these are like the concepts for automous fleets that follow a human pace car.
So human A chimes in on a certain subject, and his entourage of a few bots follow, to help add momentum to the humans words, increasing propaganda efficacy
Bots don't debunk though. They add. They inflame. They argue. They don't have a mild discussion. Bots are there to make people emotional. Not to create reason. It's one easy way to different.
It's easy to spot the difference just in the topic. Bots are limited and targeted.
They might post jargon, but they never try to appeal to reason. That was one thing that stood out about Q was the appeal to critical thinking and digging.
No, it wasn't. I trimmed the conversation down. This is the summarized version not the lengthy one they wrote. I just wrote an abbreviated version of what was a long conversation between two leftists. What's funny is how clueless the two leftists were to what they were actually saying. Since both wrote two page responses they couldn't actually understand their own words.
They love word salads, but they hate listening. And Lefty #1 didn't even pick up that his own argument had been debunked. Lefty #2 didn't even realize that he had actually prove Q's point about the sealed indictments. You see that tho with a lot of the shills and leftists. Lots of talking. Very little listening.
GPT3+ is pretty convincing, don't be so sure anything you read anywhere was written by a human.
I think a lot of these are like the concepts for automous fleets that follow a human pace car.
So human A chimes in on a certain subject, and his entourage of a few bots follow, to help add momentum to the humans words, increasing propaganda efficacy
Bots don't debunk though. They add. They inflame. They argue. They don't have a mild discussion. Bots are there to make people emotional. Not to create reason. It's one easy way to different.
It's easy to spot the difference just in the topic. Bots are limited and targeted.
They might post jargon, but they never try to appeal to reason. That was one thing that stood out about Q was the appeal to critical thinking and digging.
So when is something going to actually happen? Been hearing this forever and ......NOTHING!