UK Scientist Reveals Bombshell Data Analysis: Tracks Batches Of Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen, Finds "..Some Batches Are 50 Times Worse Than Others"
(celiafarber.substack.com)
⚠️ Vax-TYRANNY ☠️
Do we have to post garbage like this every single week?
The VAERS data doesn't provide enough information to tell you if one batch is worse than another. Anyone claiming otherwise doesn't understand statistics.
One batch appearing worse than another can be for a whole variety of reasons, such as one batch being larger, or a batch artificially shrinking due to having damage during shipment or being forgotten in the back of a warehouse somewhere.
VAERS reporting isn't complete either. Some doctors/hospitals will report every occurrence, others aren't even aware of the system and won't be reporting anything. A batch being split across multiple locations, or being sent to a single location will also skew what adverse events are reported.
The bottom line is, VAERS shows these so called vaccines are dangerous. Trying to invent new information based off of necessary data you don't have is not the work of any real "scientist" and it's not a bombshell. People not knowing how statistics work isn't anything new.
One of the conditions for EUA is consistency of product. Covid vaccines show 10 times more variation than flu vaccines.
And we all know how effective the flu vaccines are.
You don't know anything about the consistency of the product from the VAERS data. The VAERS data is useful to be aware if something adverse is occurring, it does not contain the information required to determine if the product is consistent or not.
They correlated adverse reactions with batch numbers and found them to be inconsistent. Only an issue because Pfizer claims consistency across all batches.
Let me make this simple:
Say batch A has 100 adverse reactions reported. Say batch B has 1000 adverse reactions reported.
From this, they are concluding that batch B is 10 times deadlier.
However, if batch A had 100,000 doses injected, and batch B had 1,000,000 doses injected, then for both batches, the adverse reaction reporting rate is 1/1000. It doesn't change just because B had more reported.
The VAERS data doesn't tell you how many were injected. It doesn't tell you how they were distributed. It doesn't tell you many key pieces of data that are required to determine if one batch is deadlier than another.
Maybe the batches are mostly consistent. Maybe they aren't. Either way, VAERS doesn't provide the necessary information to make such a determination. All these articles trying to generate these sorts of statistics from the VAERS data don't know what they're doing.