More vaccinated individuals will translate to more vaccinated being infected.
I get what you're saying, but anything even close to proportionate representation of the vaxxed/unvaxxed population should be seen as the miserable failure that it is. If the vaccines worked, then we should see an inverse proportional representation.
But in this case, Denmark is 77% vaccinated, yet the vaxxed make up 89% of all omicron infections. They make up 73% of other variant infections.
If these vaccines worked, we would see a much smaller absolute number of infections and the unvaxxed making up most of them.
More vaccinated individuals will translate to more vaccinated being infected.
What matters is the infection rate, not the infection %.
That being said, if the % infected higher than the % vaccinated, we can roughly deduce the rate exceeding the rate those who are not vaccinated.
I get what you're saying, but anything even close to proportionate representation of the vaxxed/unvaxxed population should be seen as the miserable failure that it is. If the vaccines worked, then we should see an inverse proportional representation.
But in this case, Denmark is 77% vaccinated, yet the vaxxed make up 89% of all omicron infections. They make up 73% of other variant infections.
If these vaccines worked, we would see a much smaller absolute number of infections and the unvaxxed making up most of them.
Yes, which is why I mentioned the rate. It looks like the Omicron variant has ADE or the vaccine is causing VAIDS.
Agreed. I mistook your comment to be dismissive. Apologies.