Study this post....
What was the 16 yr plan?...
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
The reason I have "downvotes" is because I don't "post" content which pleases certain "retards" who follow me around just waiting to give me a downvote, regardless of the content....I don't have time to play games with these idiots....it's that simple...it gets boring and very tiresome....
Thank you, I appreciate it...And Yes, You have to think for yourself and come up with a conclusion...Not just take the word of others. Besides just making sense, wasn't that what Q told us to do?...I like to make people interested enough to go and see/enquire for themselves, and other times I give MY opinion...Once you have seen for yourself That's when you know...Or not...
Exactly. It's a tad ironic, because I thought that this was exactly what you were NOT doing, which is why I offered my feedback. I thought you were simply throwing up stuff, doing nothing more than that, without any serious thought or effort.
Glad to find out that it's not the case.
I also hope there is a clearer understanding between us now.
Q3662 and Q3906
Whoa. I think the only critic here is me (I see no other critical comments), and well, you're just plain 100% wrong when you state that I follow Purkiss. Sure, I do find u/purkiss80 posts significant ("interest" is your conclusion, not mine) - he's a prolific poster. Which is why I offered my feedback.
I am NOT to lazy to dig (How the 'f would you know that?) and I am NOT interested, just or otherwise, in packaged opinions (how do you come to that conclusion based on one comment?) and that "the critic here" is a 'not the think for yourself' type. That's total bulldust.
I'm sorry you drew all these totally false conclusions and then chose to throw them out there. Unwarranted.
Despite that, I'm quite happy for the entire dialog, because it's become an opportunity for me to reflect more on purkiss' contributions and maybe re-evaluated my own conclusions vis-a-vis that.
Or I could have just shut my mouth, NOT offered feedback, and remain ignorant.
I'm sad to see that genuinely offered feedback is unwelcome by some participants. So much ego here...
If "retards" are following you around in order to give you a downvote, then yes, I think quite possibly the appellation "retards" is appropriate. I will very rarely use a downvote. Very, very rarely.