OMICRON!?!?!? Take a peek at this and explain to me how anyone would still trust THEIR SCIENCE !!🤡🌎
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (19)
sorted by:
So, like IF the virus is designed on a computer and then constructed in a bio lab per instructions, this makes sense.
They designed Omicron, they developed it, they are now hyping it with a book copyright a year ago?? Hmmm.
Just be careful with this kind of thing. A lot of authors use templates, especially crappy authors trying to take advantage of speed to market advantages. This author could have grabbed a template, written a “book”, and forgotten to update the copyright date.
lol a bit early huh......i smell fish under the car seat.....lol
Does it also small of cat vomit and sulphur?
I did a quick search on Dr. Theresa Bishop and from what I found, she is a psychiatrist so how the hell is she knowledgeable enough about the variant to even right a book about it. Something is definitely not right here.
You misread psychiatrist instead of psychic.
I downloaded the book and it says December 2021, which is still fast to write and publish a book on something that was known to the public for mere days.
I placed an order for a copy on Dec 15 after someone posted it on here just to see what kind on nonsense it contained. I figured for $6 what the hell. It was suppose to be delivered yesterday but received an e-mail saying they canceled it due to "lack of availability."
I think it's a fear porn op that they realized was gonna be suspicious due to copyright and are in the process of trying to cover it up.
Why does Old Patriot continue to fall for these false stories?
Tighten up pal. Its really becoming embarassing fella.
Take a minute to verify this shit instead of just mass posting every meme that fits the bill.
Seems like a Psyop that went south and now they're trying to cover it up. Like all their sloppy ops.
A lawyer will sell you an older shell corporation. I didn't know it worked the same in publishing.
I tight my trust in this whole virus thing.
So the researcher of this article did a shit job of researching... No mention of researching the library of Congress to confirm the existence of copyright?
Otherwise, they're running off speculation. Confirming the existence of the copyright is what matters here and that was not addressed. The lack of "promotional material" means nothing. Books can be published without being promoted. This isn't objectively false it's unconfirmed.