Epidemiologist authors at Harvard, Oxford, and Stanford
And? Do you think the folks who rejected their proposal don't also have prestigious degrees?
The GBD came out of an economic thinktank, the American Institute for Economic Research, not a medical institute.
Let's look at these epidemiologists
Bhattacharya has four degrees from Stanford, including an MD from Stanford Medical School and a PhD in economics.
So this guy is an economist and a regular doctor, not an epidemiologist.
Kulldorff's degrees are in math, Mathematical statistics and Operations Research. He's a biostatician. His work in statistical methods is used in epidemiological software, but his career has been focus on cancer and data mining methods are used in developing vaccines.
Of the three Gupta IS an epidemiologist and has done research on COVID. However that research still hasn't been gone through peer review and been published. That's a red flag.
No practical strateg> y to implement" Yeah we have nooooo idea how to continue on life normally without forced lockdowns! /s
We aren't in lockdown and we haven't been. Very few countries did an actual lockdown. Italy did. Masking and social distancing have been the practice and restrictions on indoor gatherings. That's different from a lockdown. The implementation part I was speaking about was their strategy rested upon this assumption we could easily protect those at risk. Like those in long term care facilities. The probably is the number of people who are in that condition are dwarfed by the 80-100 million adults who have conditions that would put them at risk.
So exactly how in day to day life to we figure out who is at risk and who isn't when that is not visible.
We HAD lockdowns here. Thousands of small businesses had to let people go or close permanently. People cannot and could not see their family members or friends in hospitals or care homes. Serious question, have you been in a coma for 2 years? Or are you that detached from reality?
People can make their own decisions and decide if they are at risk. Unless you think everyone is literally TOO STUPID to do so?
Don't be a reality denying cultist. Go spread your lies somewhere else.
Are you serious? "No practical strategy to implement" Yeah we have nooooo idea how to continue on life normally without forced lockdowns! /s
Epidemiologist authors at Harvard, Oxford, and Stanford also have noooo clue what they are talking about. /s
Begone shill!
And? Do you think the folks who rejected their proposal don't also have prestigious degrees?
The GBD came out of an economic thinktank, the American Institute for Economic Research, not a medical institute.
Let's look at these epidemiologists
So this guy is an economist and a regular doctor, not an epidemiologist. Kulldorff's degrees are in math, Mathematical statistics and Operations Research. He's a biostatician. His work in statistical methods is used in epidemiological software, but his career has been focus on cancer and data mining methods are used in developing vaccines.
Of the three Gupta IS an epidemiologist and has done research on COVID. However that research still hasn't been gone through peer review and been published. That's a red flag.
No practical strateg> y to implement" Yeah we have nooooo idea how to continue on life normally without forced lockdowns! /s
We aren't in lockdown and we haven't been. Very few countries did an actual lockdown. Italy did. Masking and social distancing have been the practice and restrictions on indoor gatherings. That's different from a lockdown. The implementation part I was speaking about was their strategy rested upon this assumption we could easily protect those at risk. Like those in long term care facilities. The probably is the number of people who are in that condition are dwarfed by the 80-100 million adults who have conditions that would put them at risk.
So exactly how in day to day life to we figure out who is at risk and who isn't when that is not visible.
We HAD lockdowns here. Thousands of small businesses had to let people go or close permanently. People cannot and could not see their family members or friends in hospitals or care homes. Serious question, have you been in a coma for 2 years? Or are you that detached from reality?
People can make their own decisions and decide if they are at risk. Unless you think everyone is literally TOO STUPID to do so?
Don't be a reality denying cultist. Go spread your lies somewhere else.