is this supposed to be a bad viewpoint?
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (52)
sorted by:
Seethe, faggot.
A quick glance at your comments... Honestly don't look like a tard. Do forgive. So, why are you siding as you are? Do you have some knowledge of the stones?
Much the same as anyone else that's done even simple cursory research.
A lot of this stuff sounds good on paper, like many surface level things Masons/Illuminists say but when you actually understand the implications of what's being said it becomes alarming.There's also the issue of worshipping "reason" like the French revolutionaries did and we all saw how well that turned out. It's the issue with all Utipian endeavors: it tickles the ears with pleasant sounding things but in reality just paves the way to hell. Immanetizing the Eschaton and all of that.
Very good. If you review my year or more comments you will see I have never argued for the proposals of the stones one way or the other. I tend to agree with your synopsis. That said, lets look at #1. This is construed as population reduction and often mis-read. It is actually a message for a future "coming out of the caves" generation who will be survivors of the coming micro-nova. It's a number that will(may) be sustainable without periodic mass extinction. It will seem like a huge number to the 2 to 5 million who are among the survivors. The project was the brainchild of a group of prophetic "Christians of the Rose Cross" (RC Christian) to provide hope and guidance to a devastated few survivors on a trashed planet with depleted resources. So, ...why the forgotten languages? and ...supwit the time capsule?