Their own words condemn them
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
A third option would be a freudian slip. The way the snopes article is written though... is usually the way they write stuff to scrub the truth.
He literally states that. Whether he misspoke, that's their interpretation. But you can't say he didn't state that when he 100% stated those words.
Damage control. Until we hear the person himself say that he misspoke, anybody's interpretation is equally valid.
Sure, I’ve already said it could have been a Freudian slip and snopes is always sus af; and it’s def a possible interpretation, my POINT is that Occam’s razor does not point to openly admitting child genocide on global tv. Totally open to the possibility- but I’m saying is PLENTY OF PEDES need to pump their brakes until we see more
I've already addressed that. Gates openly admitted at a ted talk that vaccines are being used to lower the global population. It's not a secret in the eugenicist community, so it does not fail occam's razor.
Remember Biden's "most extensive voter fraud" comment? It was true. Maybe he misspoke also, but more importantly it's true.
Somewhat feasible, or even fairly possible is not the same as simplest/most obvious. This guy isn’t Gates or biden, so using their statements (Regardless of how evil/senile) as evidence to what this guy would/wouldn’t say, isn’t correct. Believe what you want, idgaf; and I’m tired of spending this much time on a nothing burger. ✌🏼
Taking a statement at face value satisfies Occam's Razor. On the other hand, making assumptions about mispronunciations which are HIGHLY UNUSUAL (English is the primary language for academics in Ethiopia) and not confirmed by the speaker.. well, that's going against Occam's Razor.