Coolest Q drop, imo.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (156)
sorted by:
Are they Spheres though? What have YOU empirically seen & proven with your own eyes, vs. what NASA & academia have shown you?
You perhaps have been on a plane 35,000 ft up in the air or boat with a vision of site of hundreds of miles; your eyes have empirically NOT seen a curve.
But hey, deny your eyes, deny your senses. Trust the Masonic order that gave you the sphere heliocentric model, trust the Masons that tell you they landed on the moon.
Well I can see the curvature of the earth from elevation. I have seen that with my own eyes. I mean, let's not even talk about the suns travel through the sky, how it changes according the position of the earth and its rotation. Lets not talk about how the sky is illuminated and on particularly clear dusks you can see the gradient form as a result of the different thicknesses of atmosphere effecting the light passing through it.
I've watched enough details on war time radar and gunnery range finding to know that the curvature of the earth was an issue for big guns.
You can watch the stars rotate in the sky from different points of the world, tie those image together and model the shape of the earth.
We can, oh, you know, circumnavigate the planet. How does a flat earth account for that?!
We know that gravity is not even across the surface of the planet and appears to be tied to the densities of the geographic locale.
I'm not denying my eyes, you are. That's the sad part.
The moon landing being faked? Well now there is a theory that can at least be rationally argued as being plausible.
Masonry is the fountainhead that we have all drunk from. From Copernicus, Patron Saint of the Masons, who gave us the theory that the Sun is the center of the Universe, to Galileo, another Patron Saint of the Masons, who gave us the Heliocentric model, to Freemason Isaac Newton, who gave us the theory*** of gravity.
We have common ground on our doubts over the moon landing. All five Apollo 9 astronauts were Masons. Research just how many astronauts are also Masons. Masonry, according to Albert Pike is a religion. Looking at the situation through an anthropological perspective, is it that much of a stretch to consider the possibility that we have seen two competing religions struggle for dominance over people’s world view (dare I say, the ultimate struggle is for souls)?
I trust my instincts that also is in line with the Bible. I don’t trust the doctrines of devils, which Masonry is obliviously intertwined with.
Look, you believe whatever you like.
That said, the physical world agrees with the idea that the earth is spherical in shape. The arguments in support of a flat earth require suspending understanding of simple physical properties, and thousands of years of gathered evidence.
There are all kinds of shitty people out there, all kinds of lies... So you either believe a lie or are pushing a lie. Both are not good.
Why is only earth flat and everything else is sphere like? Why can we see the other planets rotating and orbiting? Why ignore a universe of evidence to believe the earth is flat?
The only answer I can come up with, is a shill to make Q followers look retarded.
Q himself called out the Masons, but you have a hard time questioning them when it comes to your understanding of what you been taught by Masons?
You can call me a shill for standing up for my biblical world view, but I think that’s a defense mechanism meant to dismiss the valid points I bring. You can’t deny the fact that you believe in the theories spoon Fed to you by the Masonic order.
Albert Pike, grand Master of Masonry, said that Lucifer is the true light. If you want to base your world view on what MASON’s have indoctrinated you, by all means, have at it. Thankfully I don’t give a crap what you believe.
Looking at things from anthropological perspective, There is no separating people’s understanding of the Universe outside of what has been given to us by Secret Society known as Masonry. Yes, I doubt the theories & tales spoon Fed to us by them.
I believe in imperial evidence - have you empirically seen the planets rotate with your equipment or are you relying on “evidence” given to us by NASA? Anthropologically speaking, much of the “evidence” people rely on isn’t imperical or replicatable, it’s dogmatic doctrine we repeat.
I’ve been in cockpits, I’ve been out to sea, I’ve never seen a curve.
How do you explain Polaris? The Star that stays fixed, when we are supposedly speeding through the galaxy at tens of thousands of miles per hour?
It is not fixed, it's just very near to the center to the axis of rotation, so it appears fixed.