Interesting: Q predicted "all assets will be deployed this election" (referring to the then upcoming 2020 presidential election) and mentions sleepers will shift position [Paul Ryan_Fox].
Fox, of course, were the first ones to call Arizona for Biden (while Trump was in the lead) and they helped legitimize the steal because they were supposedly a "conservative" news channel.
Ugh I hate that shit. Friend that links me qult hq shit asked me why I was tripping when even Fox was trying to call things for the dems. It's the one and only time he ever tuned into that channel to "see the other side" and it's the fucking moment they backstabbed geotus.
FOX is a tricky one for me because, as we know now, the supposed โlossโ of the election was not only anticipated, but a necessary evil. It would have been too risky to sweep up all the swamp creatures without setting traps for all the minions, ensuring the best options for rescuing individuals who were/are kidnapped-trafficked, perhaps disabling any dead-man-switches, infiltrating the thuggish hordes (antifa-blm misfits) and perhaps neutering them, easing the truth of the horrific reality out, slowly breaking the mockingbird programming and so forth.
All that said, the thing that sticks in my mind is that it appears thereโs one media outlet missing from the long lists Q provided. You donโt need a spotlight and cowbells to pick out that glaring omission, imho.
I'm thinking maybe the Fox sleepers weren't deployed in 2016 because they never thought HRC would lose?
Paul Ryan joined Fox in 2019, did things change around that time at Fox?
Maybe there is some white hats at Fox too?
I agree its tricky, hopefully we'll find out some day who played what part.
hey! which post is this please
Q-Post #4537
https://qalerts.app/?q=%234537
Interesting: Q predicted "all assets will be deployed this election" (referring to the then upcoming 2020 presidential election) and mentions sleepers will shift position [Paul Ryan_Fox].
Fox, of course, were the first ones to call Arizona for Biden (while Trump was in the lead) and they helped legitimize the steal because they were supposedly a "conservative" news channel.
Looks like a pretty solid Q proof
Ugh I hate that shit. Friend that links me qult hq shit asked me why I was tripping when even Fox was trying to call things for the dems. It's the one and only time he ever tuned into that channel to "see the other side" and it's the fucking moment they backstabbed geotus.
FOX is a tricky one for me because, as we know now, the supposed โlossโ of the election was not only anticipated, but a necessary evil. It would have been too risky to sweep up all the swamp creatures without setting traps for all the minions, ensuring the best options for rescuing individuals who were/are kidnapped-trafficked, perhaps disabling any dead-man-switches, infiltrating the thuggish hordes (antifa-blm misfits) and perhaps neutering them, easing the truth of the horrific reality out, slowly breaking the mockingbird programming and so forth.
All that said, the thing that sticks in my mind is that it appears thereโs one media outlet missing from the long lists Q provided. You donโt need a spotlight and cowbells to pick out that glaring omission, imho.
https://qalerts.app/?q=%231515
Brings up some questions for sure.
I'm thinking maybe the Fox sleepers weren't deployed in 2016 because they never thought HRC would lose? Paul Ryan joined Fox in 2019, did things change around that time at Fox? Maybe there is some white hats at Fox too? I agree its tricky, hopefully we'll find out some day who played what part.
4537
https://qposts.online/?q=When+does+COVID-19%5B2%5D+MSDNC+%5Bfear%5D+push+end%3F&s=keyword