We've already passed presidential election + 1 year. Unless this refers to the inauguration.
I'm holding out for Jan 21st when the occupied territory is no longer bound by the Geneva Convention. If nothing happens then I'll find something else to date fag about.
I have been looking for the text regarding 1 year/occupied territory. I had read that somewhere a while back, but when I went to find the text some months later I couldn't. I was looking for it in the DOD's Law Of War Manual. You say it is in the Geneva Convention? If possible, could you provide a link or just tell me where I can find that specific text? I have been looking for it.
Thanks in Advance!
11.3.2 Duration of GC Obligations in the Case of Occupied Territory. In the home
territory of parties to the conflict, the application of the GC shall cease on the general close of
military operations.
86
In the case of occupied territory, the application of the GC shall cease one year after the
general close of military operations; however, the Occupying Power shall be bound, for the
duration of the occupation, to the extent that such State exercises the functions of government in
such territory, by the provisions of the following Articles of the GC:
• 1 through 12 (general provisions and common articles, e.g., the Protecting Power
continues to function, and the derogation for security reasons continues to apply);
• 27, 29 through 34 (humane treatment);
• 47 (preserves rights as against change by annexation or arrangement with the local
authorities so long as occupation lasts);
• 49 (transfers, evacuation, and deportation);
• 51, 52 (prohibitions against certain compulsory service and protection of workers);
• 53 (respect for property);
• 59, 61 through 63 (facilitating relief programs);
• 64 through 77 (criminal proceedings); and
• 143 (access by Protecting Powers and the ICRC).
87
The one-year time limit for the cessation of the application of the GC (apart from the
provisions that continue to apply to the extent that the Occupying Power exercises the functions
of government in occupied territory) was proposed to account for situations like those of
85 Refer to § 11.4.2 (Limitations on the Power of the Occupying Power Stemming From Its Lack of Sovereignty
Interesting: Q predicted "all assets will be deployed this election" (referring to the then upcoming 2020 presidential election) and mentions sleepers will shift position [Paul Ryan_Fox].
Fox, of course, were the first ones to call Arizona for Biden (while Trump was in the lead) and they helped legitimize the steal because they were supposedly a "conservative" news channel.
Ugh I hate that shit. Friend that links me qult hq shit asked me why I was tripping when even Fox was trying to call things for the dems. It's the one and only time he ever tuned into that channel to "see the other side" and it's the fucking moment they backstabbed geotus.
FOX is a tricky one for me because, as we know now, the supposed “loss” of the election was not only anticipated, but a necessary evil. It would have been too risky to sweep up all the swamp creatures without setting traps for all the minions, ensuring the best options for rescuing individuals who were/are kidnapped-trafficked, perhaps disabling any dead-man-switches, infiltrating the thuggish hordes (antifa-blm misfits) and perhaps neutering them, easing the truth of the horrific reality out, slowly breaking the mockingbird programming and so forth.
All that said, the thing that sticks in my mind is that it appears there’s one media outlet missing from the long lists Q provided. You don’t need a spotlight and cowbells to pick out that glaring omission, imho.
Two days ago, a buddy who doesn't follow Q or devolution told me he thinks this is the end of the Democrat party. He's not a normie. He's awake, but just not into the 'theories'. I'm encouraged by his unprompted evaluation.
When does COVID-19[2] MSDNC [fear] push end?
Think 2020_P election +1.
[D] party death spiral.
Q
We've already passed presidential election + 1 year. Unless this refers to the inauguration.
I'm holding out for Jan 21st when the occupied territory is no longer bound by the Geneva Convention. If nothing happens then I'll find something else to date fag about.
Mmmmm nothing like fagging a date correctly—orgasmic, some might say.
I have been looking for the text regarding 1 year/occupied territory. I had read that somewhere a while back, but when I went to find the text some months later I couldn't. I was looking for it in the DOD's Law Of War Manual. You say it is in the Geneva Convention? If possible, could you provide a link or just tell me where I can find that specific text? I have been looking for it. Thanks in Advance!
GC is referred to in LoW, Chapter 11 outlines the whole process with parameters.
11.3.2 Duration of GC Obligations in the Case of Occupied Territory. In the home territory of parties to the conflict, the application of the GC shall cease on the general close of military operations. 86 In the case of occupied territory, the application of the GC shall cease one year after the general close of military operations; however, the Occupying Power shall be bound, for the duration of the occupation, to the extent that such State exercises the functions of government in such territory, by the provisions of the following Articles of the GC: • 1 through 12 (general provisions and common articles, e.g., the Protecting Power continues to function, and the derogation for security reasons continues to apply); • 27, 29 through 34 (humane treatment); • 47 (preserves rights as against change by annexation or arrangement with the local authorities so long as occupation lasts); • 49 (transfers, evacuation, and deportation); • 51, 52 (prohibitions against certain compulsory service and protection of workers); • 53 (respect for property); • 59, 61 through 63 (facilitating relief programs); • 64 through 77 (criminal proceedings); and • 143 (access by Protecting Powers and the ICRC). 87 The one-year time limit for the cessation of the application of the GC (apart from the provisions that continue to apply to the extent that the Occupying Power exercises the functions of government in occupied territory) was proposed to account for situations like those of 85 Refer to § 11.4.2 (Limitations on the Power of the Occupying Power Stemming From Its Lack of Sovereignty
I'll fag with you, fren. No homo.
Fuck, I’ve been date fagging for four years now. I’m running out of fags to date.
election didn't take effect till January 20th BUT The Insurection at the capitol was on the 6th. One real one fake.
hey! which post is this please
Q-Post #4537
https://qalerts.app/?q=%234537
Interesting: Q predicted "all assets will be deployed this election" (referring to the then upcoming 2020 presidential election) and mentions sleepers will shift position [Paul Ryan_Fox].
Fox, of course, were the first ones to call Arizona for Biden (while Trump was in the lead) and they helped legitimize the steal because they were supposedly a "conservative" news channel.
Looks like a pretty solid Q proof
Ugh I hate that shit. Friend that links me qult hq shit asked me why I was tripping when even Fox was trying to call things for the dems. It's the one and only time he ever tuned into that channel to "see the other side" and it's the fucking moment they backstabbed geotus.
FOX is a tricky one for me because, as we know now, the supposed “loss” of the election was not only anticipated, but a necessary evil. It would have been too risky to sweep up all the swamp creatures without setting traps for all the minions, ensuring the best options for rescuing individuals who were/are kidnapped-trafficked, perhaps disabling any dead-man-switches, infiltrating the thuggish hordes (antifa-blm misfits) and perhaps neutering them, easing the truth of the horrific reality out, slowly breaking the mockingbird programming and so forth.
All that said, the thing that sticks in my mind is that it appears there’s one media outlet missing from the long lists Q provided. You don’t need a spotlight and cowbells to pick out that glaring omission, imho.
https://qalerts.app/?q=%231515
4537
https://qposts.online/?q=When+does+COVID-19%5B2%5D+MSDNC+%5Bfear%5D+push+end%3F&s=keyword
Two days ago, a buddy who doesn't follow Q or devolution told me he thinks this is the end of the Democrat party. He's not a normie. He's awake, but just not into the 'theories'. I'm encouraged by his unprompted evaluation.
Which Q post # is this?
4537
https://qposts.online/?q=When+does+COVID-19%5B2%5D+MSDNC+%5Bfear%5D+push+end%3F&s=keyword