Maybe. It also ignores, however, the maasive harm being done by them.
This is the war to end all wars. People are going to die. In this case, each of these deaths is voluntary (or at least the vast majority).
This is about harming kids.
Wrong.
This is about the Great Awakening. You feel empathy for these children. I do too. I see The Matrix however. Daily I actively work on deprogramming people. I make a lot of mistakes because its really hard. I have some idea what we are up against.
Some people (including children) must die for the Human Race to be free of the tyranny of The Matrix (and those that control it) that we have been living under for 10,000 years (yes, really, though you may not be quite there yet in your investigation, most aren't).
Adults, yes. Children, no - you're wrong there.
We are the Human Race. A child is just as much a part of it as an adult. Some must die so that all might live. That is the way of all war. I assert fewer children will die in this war than all previous wars. That is what the evidence so far suggests. Take heart in reality, don't give in to the fear of the anecdote.
some people are coerced so hard that they can't even recognize the concept of choice.
This is exactly the lesson that needs to be learned. Only at the precipice can we learn what the Truth is (that we are free, that succumbing to coercion is a choice, and that we have other choices that we are refusing to see).
We must see these things. We must grok them. This is the only way.
Trump shilling the greatness of the shots emboldens the bad actors, and harms kids.
I think your vision is too narrow, but I assert your right to your beliefs. The thing about beliefs though, if your eyes are open, when new evidence comes in, if the cognitive dissonance is not too great, beliefs change.
omits a possibility that there was another, better way.
Maybe there was. Maybe there wasn't. Q said:
4-6% lost forever.
What does this say to me? This was the lowest cost after running a million game theory scenarios that assured victory.
Second guessing "a better way" is nothing but wishful thinking based on ignorance.
Trump could have done so much more in office to stop this, and didn't.
And if he had, would that have led to the Great Awakening? There is only one goal; Freedom for all mankind.
It's not about saving a few lives. Its not about keeping everyone alive. It's not about any life. Its about all life (for all time).
He was misled, and made many puzzling choices, such as granting clemency to a Jewish terrorist instead of say, Julian Assange.
And maybe that was exactly what needed to happen to assure victory. Imagine the most complicated problem of all time. Imagine needing to get all the pieces in the right places.
Have you ever played chess? Have you ever sacrificed a piece 8 moves before that sacrifice makes sense? I have.
I am not saying don't be skeptical. I am saying don't assume you see a better way when you don't even see what the real problem is. You think a child's life is the most important thing there is. It's not even close.
For example, a common moral dilemma: Imagine a train is barreling down on a child. You can make the train change tracks, but there are a million people on the other track. Would you sacrifice a million people to save a child's life? How many would you knowingly sacrifice? Why does a child have more right to life than an adult? Are they more human?
I get it, we have built in protective instincts for children, but don't let that instinct cloud your vision of reality.
The scope of this is larger than you realize. Until you get even a glimpse of the scope of the real problem, all these "mistakes" will seem so "obvious" to you. But when you do get a glimpse of the scope, what seems like a mistake to some, seems like a solution to those that see the larger picture.
Don't assume you see the real problem. Keep doing more research. It is larger than you know.
I couldn't have children either Bjorn. You are not alone there. Some days it makes me very sad and other days very glad. I would not want a child to have to deal with any of this.
I'm sorry to hear that. My choice was finalized in my early 40's. We actually were offered a child by a tenant of ours who got pregnant. She wanted an open adoption but we so taken aback by the whole situation that we didn't even seriously consider it. The mother and the baby are just fine as are the parents who adopted the baby so all things worked out well for all parties. Now we've watched WAY too much of the ID channel and are glad we didn't, lol. Both of our lineages will essentially die with us too. Adoption is always an option for you should you strongly desire a child. All the best to you in whatever you decide.
This is the war to end all wars. People are going to die. In this case, each of these deaths is voluntary (or at least the vast majority).
Wrong.
This is about the Great Awakening. You feel empathy for these children. I do too. I see The Matrix however. Daily I actively work on deprogramming people. I make a lot of mistakes because its really hard. I have some idea what we are up against.
Some people (including children) must die for the Human Race to be free of the tyranny of The Matrix (and those that control it) that we have been living under for 10,000 years (yes, really, though you may not be quite there yet in your investigation, most aren't).
We are the Human Race. A child is just as much a part of it as an adult. Some must die so that all might live. That is the way of all war. I assert fewer children will die in this war than all previous wars. That is what the evidence so far suggests. Take heart in reality, don't give in to the fear of the anecdote.
This is exactly the lesson that needs to be learned. Only at the precipice can we learn what the Truth is (that we are free, that succumbing to coercion is a choice, and that we have other choices that we are refusing to see).
We must see these things. We must grok them. This is the only way.
I think your vision is too narrow, but I assert your right to your beliefs. The thing about beliefs though, if your eyes are open, when new evidence comes in, if the cognitive dissonance is not too great, beliefs change.
All the time.
Maybe there was. Maybe there wasn't. Q said:
What does this say to me? This was the lowest cost after running a million game theory scenarios that assured victory.
Second guessing "a better way" is nothing but wishful thinking based on ignorance.
And if he had, would that have led to the Great Awakening? There is only one goal; Freedom for all mankind.
It's not about saving a few lives. Its not about keeping everyone alive. It's not about any life. Its about all life (for all time).
And maybe that was exactly what needed to happen to assure victory. Imagine the most complicated problem of all time. Imagine needing to get all the pieces in the right places.
Have you ever played chess? Have you ever sacrificed a piece 8 moves before that sacrifice makes sense? I have.
I am not saying don't be skeptical. I am saying don't assume you see a better way when you don't even see what the real problem is. You think a child's life is the most important thing there is. It's not even close.
For example, a common moral dilemma: Imagine a train is barreling down on a child. You can make the train change tracks, but there are a million people on the other track. Would you sacrifice a million people to save a child's life? How many would you knowingly sacrifice? Why does a child have more right to life than an adult? Are they more human?
I get it, we have built in protective instincts for children, but don't let that instinct cloud your vision of reality.
The scope of this is larger than you realize. Until you get even a glimpse of the scope of the real problem, all these "mistakes" will seem so "obvious" to you. But when you do get a glimpse of the scope, what seems like a mistake to some, seems like a solution to those that see the larger picture.
Don't assume you see the real problem. Keep doing more research. It is larger than you know.
I couldn't have children either Bjorn. You are not alone there. Some days it makes me very sad and other days very glad. I would not want a child to have to deal with any of this.
I'm sorry to hear that. My choice was finalized in my early 40's. We actually were offered a child by a tenant of ours who got pregnant. She wanted an open adoption but we so taken aback by the whole situation that we didn't even seriously consider it. The mother and the baby are just fine as are the parents who adopted the baby so all things worked out well for all parties. Now we've watched WAY too much of the ID channel and are glad we didn't, lol. Both of our lineages will essentially die with us too. Adoption is always an option for you should you strongly desire a child. All the best to you in whatever you decide.