Could be an endorsement, or keep your friends close but your enemies closer.
I mean who loves Alex Jones anyway?
Regardless, there are many tactical reasons why Flynn would have said that that he would not be able to talk openly about in public. We are in an information war after all.
There are several Q posts saying Alex Jones is a bad guy.
Yes that could be part of the disinfo, but it is not very likely that this is the disinfo considering the huge number of claims Q has...and that Alex Jones indeed has been used as a way to ridicule people who have uncovered or are on the trail of real conspiracies.
Could be an endorsement, or keep your friends close but your enemies closer.
I mean who loves Alex Jones anyway?
Regardless, there are many tactical reasons why Flynn would have said that that he would not be able to talk openly about in public. We are in an information war after all.
That is why we have the Q posts to guide us.
Again, Q said disinfo would be necessary. Other than that, we have no real reason to think Alex is a bad guy.
There are several Q posts saying Alex Jones is a bad guy.
Yes that could be part of the disinfo, but it is not very likely that this is the disinfo considering the huge number of claims Q has...and that Alex Jones indeed has been used as a way to ridicule people who have uncovered or are on the trail of real conspiracies.
I only know post 2102, which asked:
What happens if Mueller 'proves' 'Free Speech Systems LLC' aka 'InfoWars' is linked to a Foreign Intel Agency or other Non_Domestic entity?
Did Mueller prove this in ANY way?