Now THAT is a great question!
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
why would you want to create even MORE jobs, when the jobs that already exist aren't being filled?
for the record, the entire concept of "creating jobs" is bullshit.
businesses operate on the concept of producing a good or service, not of providing "jobs" for their employees.
having to hire people, and thus technically "creating jobs" is the result of a businesses goal of creating goods and services.
businesses don't usually just hire some workers, just for the sake of "creating jobs", and then decide what those workers will do later.
"creating jobs" is more of that trickle-down economic theory that has never worked.
if i "hire" someone to mow my grass, did i create a job?
if i hire someone to shovel my snow, did i create a job?
if i hire someone to cut my hair, did i create a job?
if i hire someone to cook my food, did i create a job?
in each of the above examples, the "jobs" created themselves,
and it is only considered "creating a job" if you hire SOMEONE ELSE to do it for you.
and if you scrutinize almost every job in the world, you will find that
A) the actual job that needs done, usually created itself, thru natural demand for a good or serve
B) the job is usually only considered being a job, if its being done by someone else
C) hiring someone to wipe your ass isn't creating jobs, its out-sourcing.
D) the actual owners of companies encourage YOU, the hireling, to "take ownership" of the company, because the actual owners are trying to out-source their own jobs, to YOU