Far right is totalitarian. We have now moved left as we are now advocating for individual freedoms. Human rights have become a progressive idea.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (50)
sorted by:
Of course there is a distinction. If there were no distinction the tool of divide (as the first part of "divide and conquer") wouldn't work.
The point was not that there was no distinction, but that they are the design of the PTB (bankers, cabal, whatever you want to call them).
Left and Right are a fraud. As long as you adhere to one side or another, you are fully enmeshed in The Matrix.
Funny that once you dig deep enough you find the controllers are the ancient Phonecian bloodlines.. and the phonecian symbol was... the two headed bird! Those bastards have been at it a long long time.
Anyway there are clearly philosophical differences between us but they are amped up and used to distract everyone from the long con
An evolving changing government ("liberal") v. an unchanging, "let's hold on to our roots" government ("conservative") is an obvious dividing line. Once the line is created, dueling narratives can drive the two sides. Do you think it is an accident that the "two sides" have always been pretty close in size to each other throughout history?
It has always been controlled opposition. The "philosophical differences" are by design, micromanaged by the narratives, always under their control.
I'm not talking about "bad actors." I'm talking about the control structures, their origins, their designs, the media that each side puts out, etc. They are both the design of the system; The Matrix.
That may be the case in 2021, but for the other 5000 years or so of "left/right" history, this statement doesn't match reality. In fact it has flipped back and forth, applying totalitarianism to both the left and the right numerous times in history.
The standard definition of left/right is a "left" wants change, "right" wants to stay the same. That is where "liberal" and "conservative" come from.
There is another axis to these political definitions (as in, how they are defined, not "your idea" of them). That axis is the Libertarian/Totalitarian axis. Putting those axes together you get Fascism as the "conservative" totalitarianism, and Communism as the "liberal" totalitarianism. That is their definitions.
As an example of what this dual axis political spectrum might look like, look at this picture.
As that picture shows, fascism/communism are two sides of the same "socialism" coin. They even have the same origins. In one case applying economic Marxism to a "conservative ideology" and in the other case applying that economy to a "liberal ideology". Both arriving at the same conclusion starting from the left or the right.
If you want to make shit up, you can do that all day long, but that is how these things are defined. The truth is though, they are all contrivances of control.
Do more investigation and you will find that they are used to control the world, and have been for millennia, both the design of the PTB.
How is this in any way a rebuttal? Either try to engage in rational conversation or don't bother replying at all.
Untrue. When you are open to life as a phenomenon experienced as a living being and not as something framed by some constructed identity you see a lot of "leftists" are basically right wing people with gay friends or black nephews and shit.