The troops were there for the 1/6 "insurrection," not to arrest Biden. Same for the wall, it's to protect Biden.
Biden's gun salute met the definition of a presidential salute. It was not the typical presidential salute given, but it wasn't a foreign dignitary salute.
Who knows what they were looking for off the coast. I don't see any reason to assume they're helping us.
The table showing what kind of cannon salute various offices receive can be found straddling pages 4 and 5.
You'll note that the only office that receives salute with 3 cannons is "American envoys, American ambassadors having returned to the United States but not on official business, or ministers and foreign envoys, or minis- ters accredited in the United States" and "Lieutenant generals, vice admirals."
So, since you say "that's not something the army fucks up," you are telling me that the army saluted Biden as one of these offices, and not as president?
You might also point out that Trump's interval was 3 seconds, and Biden's was 4. However, the manual which you referred me to says, at para 3-3(a)(1)(c), "When such interval is not feasible considering condition of ammunition and materiel, number of guns available, proficiency of gun crews, atmospheric conditions, and other local limitations." So, basically, the interval is up to the officer in charge of delivering the salute, and in addition, the number of guns used in the salute can vary depending on how many are available.
Further, the table showing the particulars of each kind of salute doesn't differentiate between 3 and 4 second intervals. The fact that the interval was different doesn't make it a different salute.
I've outlined my reasoning and cited the document you told me to look up. Could you show me where in that manual, or where in any other official document, that it says the salute Biden received was not a presidential salute?
I'm aware of the filming discrepancies in Biden's inauguration, including the cloudy skies one minute and sun the next, and people moving around between supposedly contemporaneous cuts.
Nevertheless, you alleged the salute Biden was given was not a presidential salute. I referred you to the manual you tell me you've read, I quoted the relevant parts, showing you that the salute he received WAS a presidential salute, and further, the salute he received couldn't be interpreted as having been for any other position. It was a presidential salute. If you disagree, I invite you to read the manual you told me to read, because it's clear you haven't. I even cited it for you.
How is the fact that Biden's inauguration looked weird evidence that the US mil is on our side? If they were on our side, they'd have prevented Biden from assuming office.
These were the same troops that neither Nancy Pelosi or the DC capitol police actually knew anything about until they showed up, right?
You’re either trolling your dick off or you didn’t actually watch what happened in January.
Since you seem to be illiterate, let me re-hash this conversation:
Otheranon:
I hope so, military tribunals (I don't think) are bound to put up with any BS
Me:
The same military that's pushing gay and tranny propaganda?
The same military that sat idly by as an election was stolen?
I dunno, anon.
You:
Sat idly by like putting 40,000 troops in DC right before Biden was coronated? Sat idly by why they delivered a foreign dignitary 21-gun salute to Biden? Sat idly by while they conducted unprecedented numbers of sub hunting patrols off the eastern and gulf coasts after the fraud took place? The same military that positioned five fleets in the pacific off the coast of California that corroborated Q posts? Sat idly by while they built a motherfucking wall around the White House 12 feet high?
Wtf you smokin?
Me:
The troops were there for the 1/6 "insurrection," not to arrest Biden. Same for the wall, it's to protect Biden.
Biden's gun salute met the definition of a presidential salute. It was not the typical presidential salute given, but it wasn't a foreign dignitary salute.
Who knows what they were looking for off the coast. I don't see any reason to assume they're helping us.
You:
So who did “the troops” arrest?
These were the same troops that neither Nancy Pelosi or the DC capitol police actually knew anything about until they showed up, right? You’re either trolling your dick off or you didn’t actually watch what happened in January.
Me:
You are going to tell me they arrested Biden or any other swamp monster? Out with it, how did they help us?
How is this evidence that the troops in DC or the US mil generally are helping us?
I'm just going to put it out there, but it seems like you've lost the thread of the conversation. My assertion has been consistent: the US Mil isn't on our side. Your replies don't seem to be responding to what I'm saying at all.
Your reading comprehension is bad. OP said troops were arresting Jan six protestors. Zero proof that “troops” arrested anybody. I made no claim that troops arrested Biden or anyone else. That’s your own made up claim.
The troops were there for the 1/6 "insurrection," not to arrest Biden. Same for the wall, it's to protect Biden.
Biden's gun salute met the definition of a presidential salute. It was not the typical presidential salute given, but it wasn't a foreign dignitary salute.
Who knows what they were looking for off the coast. I don't see any reason to assume they're helping us.
Wrong. Wrong. And wrong. Go read the army drill manual. That’s not something the army fucks up.
I'm afraid it's you who are wrong.
First, here's Biden's salute:
https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/national-international/presidential-salute-battery-marks-bidens-inauguration-with-21-gun-salute/2500288/
And here's Trump's:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sN1zIJc8PUU
Yes, I agree, there are three for Biden and four for Trump. So what's the manual say?
https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN20654_R600_25_Admin_FINAL.pdf
The table showing what kind of cannon salute various offices receive can be found straddling pages 4 and 5.
You'll note that the only office that receives salute with 3 cannons is "American envoys, American ambassadors having returned to the United States but not on official business, or ministers and foreign envoys, or minis- ters accredited in the United States" and "Lieutenant generals, vice admirals."
So, since you say "that's not something the army fucks up," you are telling me that the army saluted Biden as one of these offices, and not as president?
You might also point out that Trump's interval was 3 seconds, and Biden's was 4. However, the manual which you referred me to says, at para 3-3(a)(1)(c), "When such interval is not feasible considering condition of ammunition and materiel, number of guns available, proficiency of gun crews, atmospheric conditions, and other local limitations." So, basically, the interval is up to the officer in charge of delivering the salute, and in addition, the number of guns used in the salute can vary depending on how many are available.
Further, the table showing the particulars of each kind of salute doesn't differentiate between 3 and 4 second intervals. The fact that the interval was different doesn't make it a different salute.
I've outlined my reasoning and cited the document you told me to look up. Could you show me where in that manual, or where in any other official document, that it says the salute Biden received was not a presidential salute?
Sorry bud but, no. Biden ain’t prez. Go watch the “inauguration” again. Then go watch live streams of DC of the capitol on that day.
Pre-filmed. No laying of the wreath. Not the same protocol as previous actual inaugurations. Uniforms were insanely fucked up.
Wasn’t a real inauguration.
I'm aware of the filming discrepancies in Biden's inauguration, including the cloudy skies one minute and sun the next, and people moving around between supposedly contemporaneous cuts.
Nevertheless, you alleged the salute Biden was given was not a presidential salute. I referred you to the manual you tell me you've read, I quoted the relevant parts, showing you that the salute he received WAS a presidential salute, and further, the salute he received couldn't be interpreted as having been for any other position. It was a presidential salute. If you disagree, I invite you to read the manual you told me to read, because it's clear you haven't. I even cited it for you.
How is the fact that Biden's inauguration looked weird evidence that the US mil is on our side? If they were on our side, they'd have prevented Biden from assuming office.
So who did “the troops” arrest?
These were the same troops that neither Nancy Pelosi or the DC capitol police actually knew anything about until they showed up, right? You’re either trolling your dick off or you didn’t actually watch what happened in January.
You are going to tell me they arrested Biden or any other swamp monster? Out with it, how did they help us?
How is this evidence that the troops in DC or the US mil generally are helping us?
who said anything about “helping” us?
That’s not what OP said. OP said military sat idly by. They very obviously did not sit idly by or anyone that was on this board back in January.
Since you seem to be illiterate, let me re-hash this conversation:
Otheranon:
Me:
You:
Me:
You:
Me:
I'm just going to put it out there, but it seems like you've lost the thread of the conversation. My assertion has been consistent: the US Mil isn't on our side. Your replies don't seem to be responding to what I'm saying at all.
Your reading comprehension is bad. OP said troops were arresting Jan six protestors. Zero proof that “troops” arrested anybody. I made no claim that troops arrested Biden or anyone else. That’s your own made up claim.
So how is the fact that the troops were arresting patriots evidence that the US military is on our side?
If they were on our side, they'd have arrested the real insurrectionists, namely Biden and friends. Yet, they did not.