This is for the normies.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (205)
sorted by:
You said it, though.
“They” aren’t blaming Q. Q committed no crimes, and identifying him as a troll will not chip the paint of this movement because nobody here would believe it.
They’re blaming “QAnon.” Q followers.
All Q did was describe a reality that necessitates action. His followers are (ostensibly) the ones making the choice to act. In court, a troll Q would claim he was just writing fan-fiction or an alternate reality game, just like hundreds of similar Chan posters back in the day.
There is no case against Q. He committed no crimes. He is not leading the Q movement. He never directed anyone to commit crimes. Even if a charge could stick, nobody in the Q movement is likely to accept that a troll was responsible for Q.
Who gains anything from that if Q is a nobody?
You really don't think the media would be all over it if they could prove Q was a troll? You don't think they would use that to discredit anything and everything that Q posted or Q followers talk about? All I'm trying to say is if the media/Jan 6 witch hunt could prove Q was a troll, they would. But they can't and don't even try. To me, that just further proves Q and the information put out by this community.
There has been significant speculation as to Q’s identity, including an entire documentary on the movement that apparently provided evidence it was Ron Watkins. I haven’t watched it, but the media reported quite a bit on it.
It’s just that nobody here trusts the media, the outside documentaries, or the notion that Q can be a nobody, so the media’s investigations into the subject are generally ignored around here. But they certainly have occurred.