This is for the normies.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (205)
sorted by:
I think you could make an argument both ways. My question is, if Q were fake and a big troll, why haven't they come forward? The left thinks "this is the biggest troll in the history of the internet" and this person would be a hero to them. Would be famous overnight. The media never really attacks who Q could be, always attacks "Qanon" as a whole. Idk I feel like there would be a bigger push to figure out who was behind it rather than just settling for a smirk from Ron Watkins on HBO.
To play devils advocate here I don’t think your question(s) are fair. Regardless of fame, if someone came out and proved they were Q and it was all a troll, they would undoubtedly be targeted and harassed by the most extreme followers. Look at election workers, they are getting nasty death threats so there’s no basis to say in this scenario whoever was behind Q wouldn’t. I think it’s fair to say they would have legitimate concerns for their safety.
Secondly, it may not be a liberal. I think it’s equally as possible it was a troll by a conservative that grew beyond their wildest dreams. Before this Q 4chan had an FBIanon and CIAanon that never took off just to name a few. Any ways I think it’s possible who ever started it figured it would fizzle out quickly like past anons but were shocked when it didn’t. A week turned into a month, which turned into a year, so on and so fourth. Sometimes things get away from you in life. Trump “losing” the election would have gave them a perfect out where they could disappeared into the darkness and move on with their life without ever facing and consequences.
Personally I don’t believe either of the above are accurate, im just brainstorming ideas. My personal belief (and I’ll catch heat for this) is Q was 100% legit up to the move to Watkins platform, 8kun. I think at that point Ron took over and the rest was bullshit. I though HBO was taking me for a ride but there really was an instant and definitive 180 in both writing style and complexity of posts the second Q moved over. So while I don’t believe Ron is the real Q, I do somewhat believe he stole Q to drive business to his site and drive tenure to him and his weird dad. As a result I keep my Q studies largely to pre-8kun days
Aug 2018 was last 8chan posts. 8kun Q began Nov 2018 after 93 days dark
Thanks Fren!
Q moved from 4chan to 8kun in Dec of 2017
I'm surprised you haven't been downvoted to the lowest level of hell yet.
Haha give it time. Just my opinion based on my own research. At the end of the day all of us anons are doing the best we can based on what we believe. Factually tho, none of know who Q is or how true Q is. If you ask 10 people about Q you’ll get 10 different answers. My belief may not be “mainstream” for Q, and I really hope I am wrong, but it’s simply where my own research has led me.
The left would not embrace Q, because they blame people like him for Jan 6th and people’s families being ripped apart.
The right would not embrace Q, because they see him as a distraction to split the conservative base and a way to make conservatives look like crazy conspiracy-theorists.
The Q supporters would not embrace Q, because they would have suffered the most harm in being literally the only people wrong about Q and having staked their entire reputations on that faith.
The second a troll Q comes forward, he’s ruined from every possible angle.
Yeah all true there but to your first point, since they are blaming Q for Jan 6, wouldn't they try to figure out who it is? And if they believe it was Ron Watkins, why was he not arrested? I guess it makes sense not to come forward, but I don't understand why they aren't going after Q like they have Trump, Bannon, Don Jr etc.
What could they arrest Q for, exactly?
He didn’t call for Jan 6th to occur. He isn’t responsible for the actions of his supporters if he didn’t direct them to take action.
Murderers have been inspired to murder based on Catcher in the Rye, but nobody ever arrested Salinger as a result. Because he didn’t tell them to murder anyone.
It’s not a crime to describe a world which may necessitate an insurrection, only to call for one. And Q never did.
Besides, if they hauled Ron Watkins into court and convicted him as the man behind Q, can I get a show of hands of who would believe it around here? Who here would give up on Q and log off this site for good?
Arresting Q as an internet troll would have no effect on the Q movement, because nobody here would believe Q is anyone other than a team of military operatives or something similar. And since Q committed no crimes, it’d be a waste of time all around.
I agree with everything you are saying. The whole point I'm trying trying to make is they are telling the public that Qanon is the reason behind the "insurrection" yet they are doing nothing to identify Q. If they are going to subpoena Trump, Bannon, AJ, Stone, Don Jr. For inciting their followers to take over the government, you would think they would go after the person or group they originally blamed it on. The normies should find that odd and be questioning it. Obviously, we know they are not going to bring any legitimate attention to it because it would just be digging their own graves.