It's a reasonable position- such things do turn the stomach - but I think the OP's premise is interesting and puts another angle on it.
I've had no interest in the film over the past (weeks?) for several reasons:
Yep, the whole W men pretending to be women thing (trans-disease)
The 2nd and third movies were underwhelming at best (whereas I see the first one as inspired)
A general distaste and now passionate dislike for anything coming out of the (big) film industry. Hollywood has been revealed in all its poison.
However, the OP's reasoning has sparked my interest. Most important, in my mind, is that the OP is clearly focused on the Great Awakening as a whole, on the People as whole, and is focused on THEIR good, their wellbeing, etc.
That focus on others and on the greater whole is powerful and important, imo.
On the other hand, a lot of people objecting here seem to be more focused on their own personal reaction, on their own experience of disgust, etc. i.e. NOT thinking about whether the film serves a valuable purpose, but thinking more about their own personal reaction and experience.
I'm not attempting to attack people for that, but in terms of who is pursuing the nobler, higher purpose, I have to give cred to the OP.
The reason for applying logic, reason and empiricism is to unplug our thinking and reacting processes from the programming that other factors tend to enforce, to our detriment.
That said, I find it utterly bizarre that your comment received 2 downvotes. Evidence of some rather ill spirits around here... Updoodle from me, because you make a reasonable and relevant comment!
It's a reasonable position- such things do turn the stomach - but I think the OP's premise is interesting and puts another angle on it.
I've had no interest in the film over the past (weeks?) for several reasons:
Yep, the whole W men pretending to be women thing (trans-disease)
The 2nd and third movies were underwhelming at best (whereas I see the first one as inspired)
A general distaste and now passionate dislike for anything coming out of the (big) film industry. Hollywood has been revealed in all its poison.
However, the OP's reasoning has sparked my interest. Most important, in my mind, is that the OP is clearly focused on the Great Awakening as a whole, on the People as whole, and is focused on THEIR good, their wellbeing, etc.
That focus on others and on the greater whole is powerful and important, imo.
On the other hand, a lot of people objecting here seem to be more focused on their own personal reaction, on their own experience of disgust, etc. i.e. NOT thinking about whether the film serves a valuable purpose, but thinking more about their own personal reaction and experience.
I'm not attempting to attack people for that, but in terms of who is pursuing the nobler, higher purpose, I have to give cred to the OP.
The reason for applying logic, reason and empiricism is to unplug our thinking and reacting processes from the programming that other factors tend to enforce, to our detriment.
That said, I find it utterly bizarre that your comment received 2 downvotes. Evidence of some rather ill spirits around here... Updoodle from me, because you make a reasonable and relevant comment!