If a law is struck down as unconstitutional, isn't that prima facie evidence that the politicians who voted for, signed, and executed that law are failing to uphold their sworn duty to uphold the Constitution? - The Great Awakening

509

If a law is struck down as unconstitutional, isn't that prima facie evidence that the politicians who voted for, signed, and executed that law are failing to uphold their sworn duty to uphold the Constitution?

posted 2 years ago by king07828 2 years ago by king07828 +511 / -2

Where's the prison time and excommunication for politicians that violate their oaths?

58 comments

58 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (58)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– Tewdryg 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Yep. When the Constitution is not being taught, but instead 'Law Positive' is the predominant theory of law schools, the expected should be of no surprise. The subversion is great, but can be remedied by reverse coursing to Civics classes.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– Phishhed44 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

Man we need Civics more than ever. 150 years ago a HS Grad knew more than today’s College Grads by a long shot. We naturally perceive the advancement of man on a linear scale, which is a fallacy. (They’ve) been dumbing-down John Q Public for over a century.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– flapede 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

I’ll go with Civics and Common Law for 1776, Alex.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– Phishhed44 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Beauty 😎

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q