See this is much better evidence than just "they have patents" and "It’s obvious". I did see that you referenced a video in your previous comment but as you didn't link it in that one I had nothing to really go on other than "patents" and your word. And while I had seen a couple of the "UFO" clips in that video before I hadn't seen the triangular one that matched with the patent you mentioned. So from where I was sitting, it seemed you were basing your claim solely on the patent's existence.
I'd agree this is much more concrete when adding the video into the mix than my time machine claim. In fact, while I stand by my initial comments (other than the time machine bit) as pointing out a lack of sufficient evidence at the time I made them, I find myself agreeing that you're very likely correct on this being our tech rather than the "unknown UFO" claim they seem to be attempting to make. Thinking further it would also explain why these "UFOs" keep cropping up around US Navy ships; it's us testing our tech.
I was in the navy and did the same thing with some submarine technology against surface ships and they had no idea we were testing. Happens all the time. Sometimes they tell the captain. Sometimes they don’t. Depends on what response you want from the target.
I would assume from the video that anyone with a brain and night vision goggles on that crew also immediately put two and two together and figured out it was friendly, or they would have shot it down.
Really think a destroyer is gonna let an IR strobing enemy drone circle it for hours? If it’s not friendly, you assume it’s Chinese, not aliens.
See this is much better evidence than just "they have patents" and "It’s obvious". I did see that you referenced a video in your previous comment but as you didn't link it in that one I had nothing to really go on other than "patents" and your word. And while I had seen a couple of the "UFO" clips in that video before I hadn't seen the triangular one that matched with the patent you mentioned. So from where I was sitting, it seemed you were basing your claim solely on the patent's existence.
I'd agree this is much more concrete when adding the video into the mix than my time machine claim. In fact, while I stand by my initial comments (other than the time machine bit) as pointing out a lack of sufficient evidence at the time I made them, I find myself agreeing that you're very likely correct on this being our tech rather than the "unknown UFO" claim they seem to be attempting to make. Thinking further it would also explain why these "UFOs" keep cropping up around US Navy ships; it's us testing our tech.
I was in the navy and did the same thing with some submarine technology against surface ships and they had no idea we were testing. Happens all the time. Sometimes they tell the captain. Sometimes they don’t. Depends on what response you want from the target.
I would assume from the video that anyone with a brain and night vision goggles on that crew also immediately put two and two together and figured out it was friendly, or they would have shot it down.
Really think a destroyer is gonna let an IR strobing enemy drone circle it for hours? If it’s not friendly, you assume it’s Chinese, not aliens.