These people complain about “right wing echo chambers” on free speech sites.

I think if these people are so confident the people on free speech sites are wrong, they should get as many people who aren’t “radicalized” to go on these sites as possible, read the “radical right wing baseless” arguments, and debunk them. After all, since these people see the “radical right wing” arguments that appear and win over any place with unmoderated speech as both morally and factually wrong, it should be easy to debunk them all with facts logical and morals, and it’s a benefit for as many people to see them and attempt to prove them wrong. Right?