When people accuse the pope of being a satanist it seems hard to believe for a lot of people.
However, there is hard evidence and documentation of crimes falling under the purview of the Vatican, both financial crimes and sex crimes. In addition to that there is also some symbolic evidence at the Vatican itself that it is a satanically led organization. The symbolic evidence supports the real world documented evidence.
The original poster put together a few photos which is symbolic evidence that Betty White is a Satanist. However, they have no hard documentation, witness accounts or court cases.
Now the original poster could be a simpleton or they could be part of a disinformation campaign. I can’t tell you which one is true.
What I can tell you is that from an external perspective, random accusations pulled out of ass make us all here in the dot.win community look like idiots.
No...Its Dumbfucks like you who just can't accept someone going against your "innocent until proven guilty" narrative...Show me "Hard" evidence that the Pope is a Pedo...You Cant, yet we ALL fucking Know....I suggest you take that sanctimonious, condescending stick out of your arse...
I can’t be 100% certain that the pope is guilty. However, he and his organization deserve a closer look. Why? Because of the factual evidence and witness accounts that exist.
What I am saying is that there is actual factual documented evidence of some bad shit going on at the Vatican. Court cases where people are convicted and sent to jail is factual evidence. There is “out in the open” testimony from church insiders that the current leadership of the church is corrupt.
A photo of the pope with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell is not proof of anything except that they got close to powerful people including Donald Trump. In fact, that photo of Ms. Maxwell and the pope may be fake, so I’m not going to make any conclusions based on that one photo.
Please learn how to tell the difference between photo speculation and analysis of legal documentation and witness accounts.
A photo of the pope with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell is not factual evidence, YET you're asking me "I mean do you even have one photo of Betty White standing next to the satanic artist Maria Abramovich?" which would have been sufficient evidence to suspect her for you...??????? Go Away, You're not fooling anyone with your bias BS...
You’re right, Marina Abramovic got very close to a lot of Hollywood people and not every single individual caught in a photo with her is guilty.
However, YOU DON’T EVEN HAVE THAT LEVEL OF SHITTY EVIDENCE. Also you have no witness accounts of Betty White being involved in Satanic activities. You have no court documents that hint that Betty White may have been involved in satanic activities.
Your main forms of evidence were: “She has panda earrings” and “She looks like another old lady.”
When people accuse the pope of being a satanist it seems hard to believe for a lot of people.
However, there is hard evidence and documentation of crimes falling under the purview of the Vatican, both financial crimes and sex crimes. In addition to that there is also some symbolic evidence at the Vatican itself that it is a satanically led organization. The symbolic evidence supports the real world documented evidence.
The original poster put together a few photos which is symbolic evidence that Betty White is a Satanist. However, they have no hard documentation, witness accounts or court cases.
Now the original poster could be a simpleton or they could be part of a disinformation campaign. I can’t tell you which one is true.
What I can tell you is that from an external perspective, random accusations pulled out of ass make us all here in the dot.win community look like idiots.
No...Its Dumbfucks like you who just can't accept someone going against your "innocent until proven guilty" narrative...Show me "Hard" evidence that the Pope is a Pedo...You Cant, yet we ALL fucking Know....I suggest you take that sanctimonious, condescending stick out of your arse...
I can’t be 100% certain that the pope is guilty. However, he and his organization deserve a closer look. Why? Because of the factual evidence and witness accounts that exist.
What I am saying is that there is actual factual documented evidence of some bad shit going on at the Vatican. Court cases where people are convicted and sent to jail is factual evidence. There is “out in the open” testimony from church insiders that the current leadership of the church is corrupt.
A photo of the pope with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell is not proof of anything except that they got close to powerful people including Donald Trump. In fact, that photo of Ms. Maxwell and the pope may be fake, so I’m not going to make any conclusions based on that one photo.
Please learn how to tell the difference between photo speculation and analysis of legal documentation and witness accounts.
In the future, please be less dumb.
A photo of the pope with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell is not factual evidence, YET you're asking me "I mean do you even have one photo of Betty White standing next to the satanic artist Maria Abramovich?" which would have been sufficient evidence to suspect her for you...??????? Go Away, You're not fooling anyone with your bias BS...
You’re right, Marina Abramovic got very close to a lot of Hollywood people and not every single individual caught in a photo with her is guilty.
However, YOU DON’T EVEN HAVE THAT LEVEL OF SHITTY EVIDENCE. Also you have no witness accounts of Betty White being involved in Satanic activities. You have no court documents that hint that Betty White may have been involved in satanic activities.
Your main forms of evidence were: “She has panda earrings” and “She looks like another old lady.”
Or did I miss something.
Please be less dumb.