I was thinking in terms of treason and coup attempts.
Yes, one pervert was arrested for making adult women rich and famous in exchange for sex. I feel like the real victim here because I've just been giving it away.
It wasn't just one person or two in the last few years. Check your facts, it is traffic ring after traffic ring broken up, king pins taken down, slaughter after slaughter in a war few people knew where taking place.
Imagine the book of Dune, one great House at war with another great house, allies and enemies, at war for the spice. Maybe a few great houses did not like how the Rothschilds and Rockefellers and their allies where running things?
Get with the program. I'm not even saying the one's taking down their enemies Child trafficking rings are any better than the assholes in charge the last 20 years, I am just saying it is war.
I'm still unsure if those sex traffickers were arrested only because they were competing with the deep state's human trafficking networks in the same way the deep state arrests certain drug lords who compete against their opium income.
I'm firmly convinced it is just one deep state vs another deep state, one just appealed to a specific crowd that was bullshitted by faith in nonsense, while poisoning them and making sure their children could not reproduce.
Given how us, Australia, New Zealand, most Asian nations and every European nation (with one or two exceptions) are all dancing in perfect unison to the New World Order's song / death by open borders / Covid holocaust hoax... I'm fairly certain our deep state is just the North American branch of the Harry Potter Banking Goblin's New World Order.
I doubt any competing deep state could last one round against the world's most powerful, richest and most influential tribe of banking goblins.
My reply ("Ha!") was actually to Sutton above, with (her, presumably) comment of I feel like the real victim here because I've just been giving it away.
It just made me laugh is all.
When comments and replies get thick and heavy, this posting software makes it very difficult to know who the hell is replying to who. Or maybe you knew who I was replying to and just wanted clarification of my meaning.
I was thinking in terms of treason and coup attempts.
Yes, one pervert was arrested for making adult women rich and famous in exchange for sex. I feel like the real victim here because I've just been giving it away.
It wasn't just one person or two in the last few years. Check your facts, it is traffic ring after traffic ring broken up, king pins taken down, slaughter after slaughter in a war few people knew where taking place.
Imagine the book of Dune, one great House at war with another great house, allies and enemies, at war for the spice. Maybe a few great houses did not like how the Rothschilds and Rockefellers and their allies where running things?
Get with the program. I'm not even saying the one's taking down their enemies Child trafficking rings are any better than the assholes in charge the last 20 years, I am just saying it is war.
Love the analogy with Dune! Clarifies the situation!
I'm still unsure if those sex traffickers were arrested only because they were competing with the deep state's human trafficking networks in the same way the deep state arrests certain drug lords who compete against their opium income.
I'm firmly convinced it is just one deep state vs another deep state, one just appealed to a specific crowd that was bullshitted by faith in nonsense, while poisoning them and making sure their children could not reproduce.
But that's just my humble opinion.
Given how us, Australia, New Zealand, most Asian nations and every European nation (with one or two exceptions) are all dancing in perfect unison to the New World Order's song / death by open borders / Covid holocaust hoax... I'm fairly certain our deep state is just the North American branch of the Harry Potter Banking Goblin's New World Order.
I doubt any competing deep state could last one round against the world's most powerful, richest and most influential tribe of banking goblins.
Ha!
Was that a, "Ha" of see, I knew I was right?
Or was it a, "Ha" of derision?
Edit: third option, you were proving your point to someone third party and I was just a bet, of sorts.
My reply ("Ha!") was actually to Sutton above, with (her, presumably) comment of I feel like the real victim here because I've just been giving it away.
It just made me laugh is all.
When comments and replies get thick and heavy, this posting software makes it very difficult to know who the hell is replying to who. Or maybe you knew who I was replying to and just wanted clarification of my meaning.