“Can you ‘splain more about the Rh- and 24-23 chromosome thing?”
All primates and monkeys have a protein marker on their blood cells called the Rh marker. RH stands for RHesus monkey within which we first discovered this protein blood marker. Having Rh positive or Rh negative blood affects the success of blood transfusions because your immune system will reject the opposite blood type.
For some reason, 15% of humans don’t have the Rh blood marker so we label them as Rh-. A good amount of these people are white Europeans and many of them do have blue eyes. The mysterious Basque people of northern Spain have the highest percentage of Rh- blood (about 27%). They also claim to be descended from Atlanteans. Of course, blue eyes are also another strange genetic variation in an animal that used to spend all its time outside. I have blue eyes and it sucks because without sunglasses the summer sun hurts my eyes and I have a higher chance of getting cataracts.
Anyhow, Rh+ or Rh- blood can be harmful to the health of a pregnant woman and child if the child has the opposite of the mother. From an evolutionary perspective, it doesn’t make sense for Rh negative blood to exist. No one has explained the benefits of it and we definitely know that it impacts reproductive health. Before we had modern medical interventions for the Rh pregnancy problem, a constant number of women or children would simply die during gestation of Rh blood type incompatibility.
What about the missing chromosome, you ask… All other primates besides humans have 24 pairs of chromosomes. But for no good reason at all, suddenly some hominoids popped up with 23. Two pairs of primate chromosomes became chromosome pair number two in humans for no good reason whatsoever.
However, in my opinion, the most important human genetic anomaly is the great variety and commonality of prepubescent genetic disorders in human children. When a genetic disorder ends up killing a child, that child cannot directly pass on its genetic disorder. Yet these genetic disorders in humans persist in a deeply flawed human genome. We don’t see this wide variety of genetic disorders in wild animals. However, in domesticated animals like cats and dogs we do see a somewhat greater variety of genetic disorders. Why do domestic animals have these disorders? Because of human intervention in their breeding. When we over-select for certain traits, we can end up with something like the pug, a dog that can’t breathe properly due to its overly short face. Human intervention in the breeding of domestic animals created some of their genetic problems.
So did some type of intervention into human DNA end up leaving us with a deeply flawed genome? Are we allowed to ask that question?
If you do a Google or a Bing search on these topics there’s quite a bit of information about them. Despite the fact that information on these topics exists, we rarely hear about them in school. It's because they don’t want us really understanding who we are.
It is the same reason they must cover up existence of Bigfoot. Once we understand who Bigfoot are, we will have a much better understanding of who we are.
It's odd for this to come up just now, because just the other day I was discussing with my wife how completely abnormal the human birth cycle is compared to all the other mammals on this planet.
No other mammal is as incapable as a human baby, nor for as long, it's just weird. However, once through this phase a human child becomes the master of the animal kingdom and appears to have more abilities than 99% of humans use (think of people who dedicate their lives to a single activity and achieve amazing feats of physical and mental prowess).
Considering how much of our DNA we have in common with other mammals on earth, the 'oddities' stand out even more.
I don't see how this came about naturally, after all, what is the evolutionary advantage of having a child that is totally incapable for so long a period?
Also, while great apes all have 48 chromosomes (24 pairs), humans have only 46 (23 pairs). How does a species lose TWO ENTIRE CHROMOSOMES (1 pair) and come out better? Things humans have (with 23 pairs) that the primates don't have (with 24 pairs): Speech, walk upright, higher reasoning skills, music, literature, agriculture, civilization....and the list goes on.
“We lose chromosome, why brain get bigger?
One less chromosome pair in head means more room for brain to grow.
It make sense to me.”
-Grog the Neanderthal anthropologist
The flaw is you believe the shit you are told. If you think life just began in pond scum and evolved and changed species than you are long lost fren. Everything you are taught is a lie, no exceptions.
Sasquatch info fren (sorry, me again)
http://www.human-resonance.org/sasquatch.html
I believe the Pug also needs to have caesarean sections to be born in most cases because the head is so large it has trouble coming out of the birth canal. Dog breeding has gotten pretty insane, the variations that have arisen in such a short evolutionary time span are very diverse. If modern society collapsed, I cant see packs of Chihuahuas taking over and thriving on their own in Sub-Saharan Africa with all the predators that currently exist, but who knows maybe they would specialize and become underground dwellers like meerkats.
I think to a certain extent humans also domesticated themselves. I look at DNA as a code and it behaves like code. Any code that is capable of replicating can replicate, the code itself does not factor in if that code is ultimately doomed to become unable to replicate further down the line. Also we are not code in a vacuum, we exist running simultaneously with other code, a symphony of multi threaded code is the human species.
In some science fiction shows the grey alien species are said to be incapable of breeding, and they are said to instead rely on continuous cloning which would mimic the natural life and death cycle of the species, the end result the same: allowing them to continue to exist and remain immortal as an species (just like humans), the code instead of being polymorphic code: breaking apart and recombining with another set of instructions would instead rely on asexual reproduction: copying and pasting the same code continually to achieve the same result. I think this type of replication is more vulnerable to the original code degrading or fraying, its not as stress tested from mutation or error as sexual reproduction. Some animals are capable of asexual reproduction and virgin births if there are no males, some can do it, some use it as their exclusive method of replication. I believe aphids mostly use asexual reproduction, and some condors and snakes and maybe frogs and fish can have virgin births if no males are present.
There has already been intervention in our own genetic evolution and in other species as well. It does not matter if the changes were made by an external force or internal. Humans are beginning to hack the DNA code with crispr technologies. I cant wait until we can edit our code to the point where we can ditch the code and exist as pure energy. We may have already bootstrapped our own existence from nothing. Replication is an awesome topic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymorphic_code
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metamorphic_code
I think you can only have this discussion once you accept that Darwin’s Theory of Evolution must be revisited..... We cannot have one discussion, without the other....
WWG1WGA
I was just re-watching the discussion for Everything You Know is Wrong by Lloyd Pye yesterday and he talks about this. Human evolution, human bone structure, genetics, Sumerians etc. If you can make it through the whole discussion he has has a lot of interesting things to say.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2YnYKV75GcVV/
I think Lloyd Pye was saying some true things but some experts have explained that some of his translations of Sumerian were borderline bullshit that helped him to sell more books.
I don’t think the Anunnaki were the only aliens who ever came to earth, landed here and interacted with us. If anything the Anunnaki were a less technological advanced group of aliens that got chased off by aliens who were more advanced and more fair minded. I’m basing that on the UFO air battles described in some ancient Indian texts and the fact that there are there’s a ruined city in India that has blast damage, melt damage with radiation levels that are still measurable.
This type of air battle was also described in the German city of Nuremberg occurring in the year 1561.
https://www.historyandheadlines.com/april-14-1561-ufos-battle-sky-germany/
Didnt see whatever the original thread was that led to this discussion.. but grateful that it happened because there is a lot of meat on these bones.
A friend of mine had this happen with her pregnancy, it almost cost her life as well as the life of her child. Thankfully both got through it. Viewed however through the lens of evolutionary selection pressures.. the notion of a mothers and child's blood being so crazy antagonistic towards each other seems like a crazy adoption to have first appear, and then persist. There are two schools of thought here I think as to why this continues..
You lean to the first of these two, but I dont think its fair to rule out the 2nd case yet.
And on the Atlantean thing, there have been almost certainly worldwide civilisation-reset level events in our past that are not widely disclosed, which makes history predate indus valley, the sumerians etc understanding of the timeline. Very strong indications of meteor impacts or tectonic activity being the cause of this (rather than say, fusion powerplants exploding or grey-goo nanotech running wild) since rock strata show lots of layers with element traces common in meteorites but rare on earth. Lots of signs of megafloods, massive temperature shifts in a very short time that snap-freezes large grazing herbivores with food still in their mouths, and so on. The randall carlson and graham hancock podcasts and interviews are must-listens if this is your sort of thing.
TLDR, the dinosaur-ending meteorite is just one of many that have had world-wide impact on life.
You are well informed, Kemosabe.
Here’s a link for the original discussion of the UFO topic.
https://greatawakening.win/p/140vt54O5G/the-most-important-topic-of-the-/
I think Bigfoot is simply the ghosts of Gigantopithecus
Do you believe Sasquatch are literal ghosts or do you mean partial genetic descendants of Gigantopithecus?
That is an original take. There are quite a few spiritual aspects to a lot of Sasquatch sightings including things like glowing orbs. However too many of the sightings involve interaction with the physical world such as the throwing of rocks, screams and the pushing in of tents.
A lot of the “standard narrative” Sasquatch groups want to label Bigfoot as some type of ape. According to the hundreds of stories that I’ve heard that’s bogus. They have way too many human characteristics. If you try to report a sighting to any of these standard narrative organizations they will try to convince you that you saw a monkey.
It seems like Sasquatch is a humanoid that at times has supernatural or ghostly powers.
Literal ghosts with poltergeist capability. Too many hunters with trail cams and people hiking, hunting, fishing for there to be no skeletons. Hell, they found like 10 dead humans just looking for that guy that killed his girlfriend a while back.
I think your ghost idea is rather intriguing but it still seems to me that Bigfoot are doing a lot more interacting with the physical world than ghosts ever do.
Or are Bigfoot simply humanoids with the ability to do ghostly things like use “mind speak” or use portals.
Who gave Sasquatch those supernatural abilities?
I’m guessing it was the same entities that messed with our DNA to take away some of our supernatural capabilities. For example, post “Tower of Babel”, we humans lost our ability to use “mind speak”, an ability that most animals seem to have.
Instead we, humans, have to rely on tribal spoken languages that tend to make it easier to divide humans into smaller, easily opposable groups. Divide and conquer.
I would say inter-dementional beings makes more sense than ghost
The important thing for all of us to agree on is that Sasquatch are definitely not just bears.
And not everyone who sees them are drunk hillbillies.
That is an interesting article and I do believe that some people have the ability to channel messages from other entities. The communication takes place despite differences in time and distance because it’s happening via astral plane frequencies.
Here’s the problem, just as the intellectual realm is full of disinformation (full of teachers, textbooks and news organizations that lie to us), the spiritual realm also contains some disinformation. There are entities out there who may only be giving us partial truths or just straight out lying to us.
I think this happens to a lot of people when they do too much DMT and start talking to naughty mechanical elves and purple witches. They get messed with a bit.
Like I tried to say I think some of the information from that article sounds legitimate. But if there’s more than one alien race and there’s probably more than one perspective on the history of our solar system and of the human races.
Well that looks like some pretty good stuff. I saved them as PDFs because I need a little bit more spiritual input into my life.
I personally believe that truth, morality etc. are stored out there in the Akashic record, collective unconscious or morphic resonance field or whatever you wanna call it.
Some spiritual individuals, some cultures and perhaps some alien species have more direct access to these moral lessons and it’s nice to see them written out.
No..this is BS. The nummo created us ..Clif high goes into it very thoroughly in q video origins of humanity and our acquatic creators. There is a great deal of evidence for this. I had done some previous research on the dogon tribe but the evidence is worldwide. It's worth listening to clifs video.we all need to know ourselves..where we came from and where we go and not religious nonsense to turn us into helpless people waiting for a god or a saviour.we don't need one