The British government admits - that vaccines have damaged the natural immune systems of people with dual vaccinations - that after a double vaccination, we will never be able to acquire complete natural immunity against Covid variants - or possibly any other virus.

posted 2 years ago by purkiss80 2 years ago by purkiss80 +46 / -2

RESULT OF WEEK 42 COVID-19 Vaccine Monitoring REPORT, UK Health Authority -> the "real" pandemic starts now! -> page 23 = "N antibody levels are lower in infected people after 2 doses of vaccine". -> "This drop in antibodies is basically permanent!"

We know that vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission of the virus on the contrary the report shows that vaccinated adults are statistically sicker and more infected than unvaccinated -> The British are now discovering that the vaccine affects the body's ability to make antibodies against the Spike protein and other parts of the virus after infection. In particular, vaccinated people do not appear to produce antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein, the envelope of the virus, which is a key part of the response in unvaccinated people. -> In the long term, vaccinees are much more sensitive to possible mutations in the spike protein, even if they have already been infected and have been treated one or more times. ==> Unvaccinated people, on the other hand, will gain lifelong or even lifelong immunity against all strains of the suspected virus after being naturally infected with it just once.

The first insurance companies back down in the face of an avalanche of compensation claims.

the term "vaccine" (and derivatives) is intended as => "experimental injection in the context of ongoing research to validate a vaccine"

Dr. Astrid Stückelberger 👉info on my Telegram channel https://t.me/Dr_Astrid_Stuckelberger

11 comments

11 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (11)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– FractalizingIron 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Actual text:

Seropositivity estimates for N antibody will underestimate the proportion of the population previously infected due to (i) blood donors are potentially less likely to be exposed to natural infection than age matched individuals in the general population (ii) waning of the N antibody response over time and (iii) recent observations from UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) surveillance data that N antibody levels appear to be lower in individuals who acquire infection following 2 doses of vaccination.

Interpretation by the Doc: "This drop in antibodies is basically permanent!"

(No idea whether this is true or not: can only confirm that this statement is NOT in the report.)

Am skeptical of the information in this analysis by the Doc. It lacks explanation of evidence. Hard to evaluate without more info.

That said, I'm confident the actual reports itself is probably about as credible as a report from the UN Council for Climate Change re: actual environmental impacts. Hocus pocus, modelling and such shite to uphold and promote their agenda.

permalink save report block reply