If you think that this is horse shit and has to stop already,,, why ?.. do you think that its another " conspiracy theory "...you know like all the other conspiracy theories that were just too out there to be true...right up to when they were proven to be true...if you need me to list them for you i would suggest that you are on the wrong website ,maybe reddit would be a better fit for you..and of course you can always have snopes do a fact check ..
Seen the bluetooth threads? Some people have claimed that around the vaxxed that a bunch of mysterious bluetooth device IDs appear not attributable to any device (phones, headphones, etc) that they are carrying.
A few years ago I was Bluetooth sniffing and after a day I would find hundreds of “new” Bluetooth devices. I was living in a pretty isolated place where maybe 10 cars would drive by within Bluetooth range. So of course I had to dig deeper.
Your device has either a public registered address, or a public random address. So there’s the Bluetooth address emitted from your phone that’s expected.
In addition, it has one or two Private Random addresses. The non-resolveable address has something to do with BLE beacons. The resolvable address uses an encryption key to permit communication between trusted devices. This is how your phone talks to headphones, etc.
The spec on public random address has it generate a new address every time the device reboots.
The spec on the private addresses has them change every 15 minutes. So you could detect about 100 new Bluetooth devices per day per device with Bluetooth. Imagine a decently filled house of tech. A few phones, some laptops/computers, a game console or two, some controllers….you could legit see a scenario with 1000 Bluetooth devices showing up out of nowhere.
Interesting, I guess its a security-orientated design to have it refreshing its own hardware address property rather than this being static and persistent. Didnt know - thanks for the info.
Oh horse shit
This shit needs to stop already
Why don’t you offer evidence suggesting this is, indeed, horse shit, rather than just a mere Jedi hand wave?
Interesting.
[They] DO want to hook us up to the “Internet of Things.”
If you think that this is horse shit and has to stop already,,, why ?.. do you think that its another " conspiracy theory "...you know like all the other conspiracy theories that were just too out there to be true...right up to when they were proven to be true...if you need me to list them for you i would suggest that you are on the wrong website ,maybe reddit would be a better fit for you..and of course you can always have snopes do a fact check ..
Got any actual rebuttal, or just hyper ventilating ?
Seen the bluetooth threads? Some people have claimed that around the vaxxed that a bunch of mysterious bluetooth device IDs appear not attributable to any device (phones, headphones, etc) that they are carrying.
A few years ago I was Bluetooth sniffing and after a day I would find hundreds of “new” Bluetooth devices. I was living in a pretty isolated place where maybe 10 cars would drive by within Bluetooth range. So of course I had to dig deeper.
Your device has either a public registered address, or a public random address. So there’s the Bluetooth address emitted from your phone that’s expected.
In addition, it has one or two Private Random addresses. The non-resolveable address has something to do with BLE beacons. The resolvable address uses an encryption key to permit communication between trusted devices. This is how your phone talks to headphones, etc.
The spec on public random address has it generate a new address every time the device reboots.
The spec on the private addresses has them change every 15 minutes. So you could detect about 100 new Bluetooth devices per day per device with Bluetooth. Imagine a decently filled house of tech. A few phones, some laptops/computers, a game console or two, some controllers….you could legit see a scenario with 1000 Bluetooth devices showing up out of nowhere.
Interesting, I guess its a security-orientated design to have it refreshing its own hardware address property rather than this being static and persistent. Didnt know - thanks for the info.