I appreciate your extended comments on my post. I'll have to be honest though, I can't seem to make sense of any of your sentences. You must be communicating using advanced modalities miles above my simple comprehension. Or perhaps you're not making enough effort to make it easily understood by the majority of your readers.
I had a similar experience attempting to read the book Transcendental Meditation. I tried for an hour or so to make sense of what the author was trying to convey, but eventually put the book down and never picked it up again.
For instance, consider this quote from Transcendental Meditation:
Pure, transcendent, unconditional states of bliss are most powerful Engines of Creation and Life Force Conduits.
What the hell is that supposed to mean? To me it's a worthless word salad meant to sell books. I did however find this interesting gem among the quotes from this book:
A true religious person should not think that “my religion alone is the right path and other religions are false.” Other religions are also so many paths leading to the same domain of transcendental bliss. Likewise, no person should think “my perception of the reality is the only absolute reality, and all others’ are false”, because each human brain has its own unique way of perceiving the reality.
ONE form within ALL flow. Everything you perceive represents a differentiated ONE (form) out of a differentiating ALL (flow). Inspiration can only be communicated by the movement (flow) of perceived differences (form).
Question "one person" by person (per sonos aka by sound) first aka what does it imply to be ONE resound to ALL sound? What does another resound represents for ONEself within ALL perceived sound?
Ask yourself...do you represent ONE within ALL? Do others represent each ONE within ALL? What doesn't represent being ONE within ALL? Also...represents implies responding (choice) to presented (perception).
Oh! I get it. Let me explain it as simply as I can.
ONE, as differentiated between ONE and the other ONE (life force vs flow versus form) was never taught to you in school. One reason One is never shown to be equal or not equal to One is that? In other words, flow (not life) when not taught in classrooms (not flow) LIFE begins to permeate into reality with only One or the Other. (Not both, as you can see in Bob Cavet's video) they were never in the sonos (not sonos) audibly connected to the basis of the flow (not flow.)
I appreciate your extended comments on my post. I'll have to be honest though, I can't seem to make sense of any of your sentences. You must be communicating using advanced modalities miles above my simple comprehension. Or perhaps you're not making enough effort to make it easily understood by the majority of your readers.
I had a similar experience attempting to read the book Transcendental Meditation. I tried for an hour or so to make sense of what the author was trying to convey, but eventually put the book down and never picked it up again.
For instance, consider this quote from Transcendental Meditation:
What the hell is that supposed to mean? To me it's a worthless word salad meant to sell books. I did however find this interesting gem among the quotes from this book:
Emphasis added.
What about this...does one represent form (life) within flow (inception towards death)?
If so; then was this ever pointed out to you throughout education? If not; then try to explain why?
Does the word "one" in your sentence refer to one person or one example? And if it's an example, to which one are you referring?
ONE form within ALL flow. Everything you perceive represents a differentiated ONE (form) out of a differentiating ALL (flow). Inspiration can only be communicated by the movement (flow) of perceived differences (form).
Question "one person" by person (per sonos aka by sound) first aka what does it imply to be ONE resound to ALL sound? What does another resound represents for ONEself within ALL perceived sound?
Ask yourself...do you represent ONE within ALL? Do others represent each ONE within ALL? What doesn't represent being ONE within ALL? Also...represents implies responding (choice) to presented (perception).
Oh! I get it. Let me explain it as simply as I can.
ONE, as differentiated between ONE and the other ONE (life force vs flow versus form) was never taught to you in school. One reason One is never shown to be equal or not equal to One is that? In other words, flow (not life) when not taught in classrooms (not flow) LIFE begins to permeate into reality with only One or the Other. (Not both, as you can see in Bob Cavet's video) they were never in the sonos (not sonos) audibly connected to the basis of the flow (not flow.)
It's perfectly clear now, thank you.