At the beginning of March, 2021, only ~10% of the population of Ireland had received the first shot, so what is your point? (10% straight from the graph in the link you provided, sheesh)
Next time you think you found a mistake in this book or any book for that matter, simply state the error you found and let Anons verify it. There is no need to editorialise or to imply that just because you think you found on error it somehow implicates the whole book to be a lie. This post is a disgrace.
Did you not see that I posted SOMEONE ELSE'S REVIEW on Amazon, and was asking what people thought of it? Sometimes I wonder whether "anons" are a bigger pain than "normies".
Because I thought the reviewer had a good point, and I thought it best if someone read his entire review, since he seems to agree with the basics of the book, but has a problem with blaringly misleading graphs, and assertions, being included in the book, which then brings into question EVERYTHING else in the book, and does seem to hint that J.F.K. Jr.'s very biased opinion of vaccines is altering his ability to just present the facts as they are, not as he believes they are. Leftists will always look for whatever slim error or omission is included with anything written that flies against their narrative, to try to discount the entirety of whatever is writen, so those of us on "the right" need to be extra careful not to have blatant errors such as was included with the book.
which then brings into question EVERYTHING else in the book
You really need to stop thinking in black and white like this.
and does seem to hint that J.F.K. Jr.'s very biased opinion of vaccines
Sad, this place is turning into reddit style thinking. All I see these days are purveyors of fear and doubt.
"the right" need to be extra careful not to have blatant errors such as was included with the book.
I would still love to see you list ONLY the things you think are errors that stand up to the scrutiny of the anons. Until then everything else you say is just FUD.
At the beginning of March, 2021, only ~10% of the population of Ireland had received the first shot, so what is your point? (10% straight from the graph in the link you provided, sheesh)
Next time you think you found a mistake in this book or any book for that matter, simply state the error you found and let Anons verify it. There is no need to editorialise or to imply that just because you think you found on error it somehow implicates the whole book to be a lie. This post is a disgrace.
Did you not see that I posted SOMEONE ELSE'S REVIEW on Amazon, and was asking what people thought of it? Sometimes I wonder whether "anons" are a bigger pain than "normies".
Why paste a whole review blindly? Why not distil whatever issue they are pointing and eliminate unwanted editorials?
Anons are only a problem when we smell shilly behaviour.
Because I thought the reviewer had a good point, and I thought it best if someone read his entire review, since he seems to agree with the basics of the book, but has a problem with blaringly misleading graphs, and assertions, being included in the book, which then brings into question EVERYTHING else in the book, and does seem to hint that J.F.K. Jr.'s very biased opinion of vaccines is altering his ability to just present the facts as they are, not as he believes they are. Leftists will always look for whatever slim error or omission is included with anything written that flies against their narrative, to try to discount the entirety of whatever is writen, so those of us on "the right" need to be extra careful not to have blatant errors such as was included with the book.
You really need to stop thinking in black and white like this.
Sad, this place is turning into reddit style thinking. All I see these days are purveyors of fear and doubt.
I would still love to see you list ONLY the things you think are errors that stand up to the scrutiny of the anons. Until then everything else you say is just FUD.
Ireland had 3% of the total population shot up with one dose by the end of the third week in January.
https://vaccinetracker.ecdc.europa.eu/public/extensions/COVID-19/vaccine-tracker.html#national-ref-tab
With only ~10% with one dose by end of February, so the reviewers point appears to be valid.