Those corrupt studies are the only source to say SARS-CoV-2 is a real physical pathogen, and yet nobody questions it. I've seem multiple FOIA request for physical evidence of SARS-CoV-2 come back saying "no records found" (and no I haven't seen one come back with evidence), and yet nobody questions it. I see people giving a generic search on google scholar as proof it exists.
I don't think people actually want to break the enemy's narrative. If they did they would learn more about how the field of virology has twisted the word "isolated".
Those corrupt studies are the only source to say SARS-CoV-2 is a real physical pathogen, and yet nobody questions it. I've seem multiple FOIA request for physical evidence of SARS-CoV-2 come back saying "no records found" (and no I haven't seen one come back with evidence), and yet nobody questions it. I see people giving a generic search on google scholar as proof it exists.
I don't think people actually want to break the enemy's narrative. If they did they would learn more about how the field of virology has twisted the word "isolated".