I have been wondering if getting covid, or getting covid shots, which both involve the spike proteins, has the same effects? This would be a brilliant plan of those who may be using this as population control. If 80% of a population gets the shots, and half of those who don't get the shots get covid, that would leave only 10% of the population totally free of the "spiked protein effects", and if the "shedding" phenomena is significant, then maybe EVERYONE is subject to the spike protein effects, to some degree.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
I have wondered the same thing, but not necessarily about those percentages. My assumption is that the spike protein from getting covid is something your natural immunity can kill and eliminate (especially with supplemnts like D3, C, Quercetin, Zinc, and NAC). But the jab... due to mRNA technology you end up producing your own spike proteins, so it's a never-ending supply of them in your body.
Anyone help me on that? Am I totally off base? I do not want to be a source of fear and rumors...
I think this was discussed in the memo exposed by Project Veritas this week.
The vaccine spike is a synthetic version of a synthetic spike (bio-engineered Covid). The memo discusses the probability that the engineered virus was released while under development, not in its finished form.
Encountering Covid naturally introduces the spike where the body is positioned to mount an immune response. Those who get sickest is more an immune system failure.
The vaccine introduces the spike directly into the bloodstream (after it’s manufactured in the cells) — bypassing the frontline immune defenses, thus more risky.