Remember that evil bill HR1 - the first one Pelosi's House proposed after gaining power?
HR1 would have allowed the Democrats to cheat in elections forever by making voter ID illegal and federalizing the elections.
It had failed and we thought we were safe, but no...
They took the guts of the bill and hid it in a new bill that gives NASA the right to lease property. The title of the bill is innocuous, but the contents are deadly.
It passed the House and it must be stopped in the Senate!
Contact the Senators now!
(202) 224- see this link for the last 4 numbers for each senator:
https://www.senate.gov/general/resources/pdf/senators_phone_list.pdf
and use this: https://contactsenators.com
and this: https://contactsenators.com/senator-email-addresses
Those sneaky lying nasty ********! That was what they were planning...
Here is a video of Rep. Cammack sounding the alarm:
Details here:
"Democrats merged the John Lewis Voting Rights Act and the Freedom to Vote Act into a single text and crammed the new bill into previously passed legislation extending NASA’s authority to lease its facilities.
Because the so-called “shell” NASA bill already cleared the House and Senate, Democrats can kick-start debate on the Senate floor without Republican support.
“We will have the ability to proceed to the legislation and debate it on a simple majority basis, something that’s been denied to us four times in the last several months because Republicans didn’t want to move forward,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said Thursday morning.
“Then, the Senate will finally hold a debate on the voting rights legislation for the first time in this Congress,” Schumer added, “and every senator will be faced with a choice of whether or not to pass this legislation to protect our democracy.”"
How did this get passed in the house? Any ideas on which rino's voted for this treachery? If any. Even the rino must realize that this makes it unlikely they will ever win another election.
A bill was passed for NASA and then they changed the language. Beats me how that is constitutional.
I think the strategy is to try to sneak it past the senators - giving them plausible deniability for voting for it by mistake - and then tying it up in litigation delays past the November election date.
The Democrats have a majority in the House. They could pass anything they want in the House.
All but 9 Republicans voted 'No', 9 didn't vote at all. (even if they all voted 'no' they could not beat all the dems 'yes' votes)
clerk.house.gov