I don’t know how we got here and haven’t heard this said, yet. So I’d like to insert this term back into the collective conscience.
WE NEED TO BEGIN THE PROCESS OF IMPEACHING THIS MOTHERFUCKER, NOW!
IMPEACH 46!
I don’t know how we got here and haven’t heard this said, yet. So I’d like to insert this term back into the collective conscience.
WE NEED TO BEGIN THE PROCESS OF IMPEACHING THIS MOTHERFUCKER, NOW!
IMPEACH 46!
Why? How can you impeach someone who isn't president?
I'd rather prosecute for treason.
they tried it with trump
I dont see value in tryingto impeach him yet. Proving his residency as invalid makes a lot more sense.
We see how well that worked with Clinton, and Trump 2x
We are still on 45 in my eyes.
Dude, why interfere when the enemy is just getting primed to throw each other under the bus?
PROSECUTE, PROSECUTE, PROSECUTE.
Gentleanons, I hear you loud and clear. And my suggestion is not intended to actually pursue impeachment — it’s a futile effort, with another plan already in motion. I know. I’ve been around this movement since the beginning.
The intent is to enter this into the public conscience. For the normies to witness a time when an impeachment OUGHT to be pursued. It’s to form the juxtaposition, publicly, to continue this great awakening.
IMPEACH!!!!
I dissagree. I think the issues have been clouded enough.
Take convaids for example. People who say it's not as bad as they want you to think it is are still helping them by perpetuating the lie that it exists in the complete absense of proof.
I think talking about impeachment will do the same thing by spreading the assumption that he was actually legally elected.
Fair point, hadn’t thought of it legitimizing the election results