When else did I call woman hags? I used the term one time on this board, which you then referenced out of context. Would you prefer I used Trump's preferred insult and call older ugly women pigs? Only "nerve" this thread struck is my lack of patience and toleration for low-intelligence, irrational people who are incapable of fairly simple concepts and refuse to admit when they've been duped by clickbait. If you're going to argue, then argue like a reasonable human being, not like some gender fluid crayon eating 3rd grader. If these are the kind of nothingburgers that are getting sticky'd on these boards, then what's the point? We can't stoop to using the same tactics they do. We have to be better. Vet better. Research better. Report better. Argue better.
Your perception of my life couldn't be further from the truth. But deep down you probably know that. Who knows, it might even be a projection of your own life struggles. Your problem is that you've slowly accepted that you lost this argument, and resorting to ad hominem is the only card left you can play. You say you don't care, but boy do you really seem to care. This of course all assumes that you're actually a person and not an ad...
Indeed, there are also potential pregnancy risks with men as they age, as you pointed out, lower sperm count, blood flow issues etc. And yet, the man in question ended up having 4 children with this woman, all seemingly in perfect health. So much for that arbitrary generalization's relevance to this case. Might explain why we don't have arbitrary age based laws making it a crime for a 60 year old to have sex with a 20 year old. If some 19 year old woman wants to bang loose skin old balls Sid, who the hell cares? It's not up to you to keep them from acting according to their own liberty, regardless of how icky or gross you and I might think it is.
The only thing that actually matters is the law and God's Law. From the facts of the case, it doesn't appear that this man violated either. Thus, calling him a "pedophile" is bearing false witness and sin. For somebody who goes around on these boards demanding that people repent, you should really consider your own advice fren.
When else did I call woman hags? I used the term one time on this board, which you then referenced out of context. Would you prefer I used Trump's preferred insult and call older ugly women pigs? Only "nerve" this thread struck is my lack of patience and toleration for low-intelligence, irrational people who are incapable of fairly simple concepts and refuse to admit when they've been duped by clickbait. If you're going to argue, then argue like a reasonable human being, not like some gender fluid crayon eating 3rd grader. If these are the kind of nothingburgers that are getting sticky'd on these boards, then what's the point? We can't stoop to using the same tactics they do. We have to be better. Vet better. Research better. Report better. Argue better.
Your perception of my life couldn't be further from the truth. But deep down you probably know that. Who knows, it might even be a projection of your own life struggles. Your problem is that you've slowly accepted that you lost this argument, and resorting to ad hominem is the only card left you can play. You say you don't care, but boy do you really seem to care. This of course all assumes that you're actually a person and not an ad...
Indeed, there are also potential pregnancy risks with men as they age, as you pointed out, lower sperm count, blood flow issues etc. And yet, the man in question ended up having 4 children with this woman, all seemingly in perfect health. So much for that arbitrary generalization's relevance to this case. Might explain why we don't have arbitrary age based laws making it a crime for a 60 year old to have sex with a 20 year old. If some 19 year old woman wants to bang loose skin old balls Sid, who the hell cares? It's not up to you to keep them from acting according to their own liberty, regardless of how icky or gross you and I might think it is.
The only thing that actually matters is the law and God's Law. From the facts of the case, it doesn't appear that this man violated either. Thus, calling him a "pedophile" is bearing false witness and sin. For somebody who goes around on these boards demanding that people repent, you should really consider your own advice fren.