Right, but the point is (with 10's of thousands of reports on VAERS), even if under-reported, you can still see that certain batches (10%) match up with 90% of the adverse effects.

So 4 adverse reported events in a good batch, might actually represent 40 adverse events if only 1-in-10 are actually reported. And on the other hand, if you have 250 adverse events reported from a "bad batch", it might actually represent 2,500 adverse cases.

The point is that we have enormous discrepancies that vary by batch, which can be tracked by the lot numbers.