Indeed. Seems incredibly unlikely that a SCOUTUS clerk would be going on the record about this subject with some random blog. I find the contents and source to be highly questionable.
CNN ~ 4 people with inside knowledge confirmed our bullshit story, but we cant name them because they aren’t authorized to talk
Me~ hey CNN, do you really expect me to believe that FOUR different insiders just happened to call YOU, of all people, just to risk their own careers, and livlihood, to verify the bullshit you are telling us is actually true?
Indeed. Seems incredibly unlikely that a SCOUTUS clerk would be going on the record about this subject with some random blog. I find the contents and source to be highly questionable.
CNN ~ 4 people with inside knowledge confirmed our bullshit story, but we cant name them because they aren’t authorized to talk
Me~ hey CNN, do you really expect me to believe that FOUR different insiders just happened to call YOU, of all people, just to risk their own careers, and livlihood, to verify the bullshit you are telling us is actually true?
Unclear to me what you're trying to convey here, VCS.
i once heard a man say, the problem with "anonymous sources" is, all you have to do to refute them, is say, "they are lying"