He better not come out talking Q stuff right away because normies aren't ready for that and MSM will torch him. He's doing fine exposing big pharma and censorship -- areas where he has a lifetime of credentials. Nothing wrong with giving us a wink and a dog whistle from time to time.
No kidding. Next thing they'll be say he believes tha Tonga volcanic blast was a DUMB being imploded by special forced and then he'll be consigned to stupidity.
Malone has been super careful and bent over backwards to be fair, and to only speak facts. His naivety (real or acted) has slowly receded ever since his appearance on the Darkhose podcast so many months ago. For me, the last step is for him to start questioning the concept of a virus. Of course that may be a bridge too far for a virologist.
Yeadon has thought long and hard to find an explanation for what he's seeing. The only answer he is come up with is the operation of pure evil. He's not trying to give anyone the benefit of the doubt. I haven't heard him say much about the virus. In his line of work belief would simply be a given.
My point was that Malone keeps the concept of virus as an unstated assumption, but I've never heard Yeadon do so.
But your point is well taken: considering that Malone gets so much more airtime than Yeadon my comparison is unfair -- I am guilty of drawing a conclusion in the absence of evidence.
He better not come out talking Q stuff right away because normies aren't ready for that and MSM will torch him. He's doing fine exposing big pharma and censorship -- areas where he has a lifetime of credentials. Nothing wrong with giving us a wink and a dog whistle from time to time.
No kidding. Next thing they'll be say he believes tha Tonga volcanic blast was a DUMB being imploded by special forced and then he'll be consigned to stupidity.
You do realize that pill in the photo is an anti-psychotic, right? 😆😆😆😆😆
Kek
Malone has been super careful and bent over backwards to be fair, and to only speak facts. His naivety (real or acted) has slowly receded ever since his appearance on the Darkhose podcast so many months ago. For me, the last step is for him to start questioning the concept of a virus. Of course that may be a bridge too far for a virologist.
Yeadon has thought long and hard to find an explanation for what he's seeing. The only answer he is come up with is the operation of pure evil. He's not trying to give anyone the benefit of the doubt. I haven't heard him say much about the virus. In his line of work belief would simply be a given.
My point was that Malone keeps the concept of virus as an unstated assumption, but I've never heard Yeadon do so.
But your point is well taken: considering that Malone gets so much more airtime than Yeadon my comparison is unfair -- I am guilty of drawing a conclusion in the absence of evidence.